green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Shoaf v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
See Sides v. Duke University, 74 N.C.App. 331, 343 , 328 *760 S.E.2d 818, 826-27, disc. review denied, 314 N.C. 331 , 333 S.E.2d 490 (1985) (holding that plaintiffs complaint stated a valid claim against defendant for “wrongfully discharging her from her employment in retaliation for her refusal to testify falsely or incompletely”), overruled on other grounds by Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Indus., Inc., 347 N.C. 329 , 493 S.E.2d 420 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis Michael Smith v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
See Sides v. Duke University, 74 N.C.App. 331 , 328 S.E.2d 818 (plaintiff's move from Michigan to North Carolina to accept employment with defendant was additional consideration which took contract out of employment-at-will rule), disc. review denied, 314 N.C. 331 , 333 S.E.2d 490 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Johnson
But see California: Cal.Civil Code § 4800(c) (West 1983 & West Cum.Supp.1986) ("community property personal injury damages shall be assigned to the party who suffered the injuries unless the court ... determines that the interests of justice require another disposition"). [4] The Court of Appeals has held that the language of our Equitable Distribution Act "creates a presumption that all property acquired by the parties during the course of the marriage is `marital property.'" Loeb v. Loeb, 72 N.C.App. 205, 209 , 324 S.E.2d 33, 38 , cert. denied, 313 N.C. 508 , 329 S.E.2d 393 (1985) (emphasis…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kristufek v. Saxonburg Ceramics, Inc.
(2×)
See also, Sides v. Duke University, 74 N.C.App. 331, 342 , 328 S.E.2d 818, 826 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 331 , 335 S.E.2d 13 (1985). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R. Marie SIDES
v.
DUKE UNIVERSITY, Gloria Farmer, Merel Harmel, and John Miller.
v.
DUKE UNIVERSITY, Gloria Farmer, Merel Harmel, and John Miller.
320P85.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 13, 1985.
Cited by 24 opinions | Published
Powe, Porter & Alphin, Durham, for defendant Duke University.
Edelstein, Payne & Jordan, Raleigh, for plaintiff.
Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, Raleigh, for defendants Merel Harmel and John Miller.
Defendant's (Duke University) petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. Denied.