green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.3 score
“iving the statutory language its natural and ordinary meaning, the wage and hour act requires an employer...to pay those wages and benefits due when the employee has actually performed the work required to earn them.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Woods v. Mann+Hummel Filtration Technology US LLC
iving the statutory language its natural and ordinary meaning, the wage and hour act requires an employer...to pay those wages and benefits due when the employee has actually performed the work required to earn them.
discussed
Cited "see"
J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.
Co. v. Mason, 291 N.C. 145, 148 , 229 S.E.2d 278, 281 (1976) (citing Oestreicher, court held partial summary judgment denying plaintiff trial of its claims in one proceeding affected a substantial right and was appealable without discussing whether plaintiff would be prejudiced by delaying appeal until after trial of counterclaims); accord Narron v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc., 75 N.C.App. 579, 581 , 331 S.E.2d 205, 206 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 542 , 335 S.E.2d 316 (1985); compare Bernick, 306 N.C. at 439 , 293 S.E.2d at 408-09 (right to have "issue" of liability to all plaintiffs tried b…
discussed
Cited "see"
Patton v. Patton
(2×)
See Poore v. Poore, 75 N.C.App. 414 , 331 S.E.2d 266 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 543 , 335 S.E.2d 316 (1985) (good will must be considered and valued in determining value of professional practice for equitable distribution); Phillips v. Phillips, 73 N.C.App. 68 , 326 S.E.2d 57 (1985) (examples of evidence useful in valuing closely-held corporation: gross sales, cost of goods sold, profit, operating expenses, income, retained earnings).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Susan M. POORE
v.
Frank Jefferson POORE.
v.
Frank Jefferson POORE.
463P85.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 19, 1985.
Cited by 56 opinions | Published
Citer courts: W.D. North Carolina (1)
[*317] Brinkley, Walser, MeGirt, Miller, Smith & Coles, Lexington, for defendant.
Curtis, Millsaps & Chesson, Charlotte, for plaintiff.
Defendant's petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. Denied.