Poore v. Poore, 335 S.E.2d 316 (N.C. 1985). · Go Syfert
Poore v. Poore, 335 S.E.2d 316 (N.C. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“iving the statutory language its natural and ordinary meaning, the wage and hour act requires an employer...to pay those wages and benefits due when the employee has actually performed the work required to earn them.”
109 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Woods v. Mann+Hummel Filtration Technology US LLC (ncwd, 2019-08-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Woods v. Mann+Hummel Filtration Technology US LLC
W.D.N.C. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
iving the statutory language its natural and ordinary meaning, the wage and hour act requires an employer...to pay those wages and benefits due when the employee has actually performed the work required to earn them.
discussed Cited "see" J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: accord · confidence high
Co. v. Mason, 291 N.C. 145, 148 , 229 S.E.2d 278, 281 (1976) (citing Oestreicher, court held partial summary judgment denying plaintiff trial of its claims in one proceeding affected a substantial right and was appealable without discussing whether plaintiff would be prejudiced by delaying appeal until after trial of counterclaims); accord Narron v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc., 75 N.C.App. 579, 581 , 331 S.E.2d 205, 206 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 542 , 335 S.E.2d 316 (1985); compare Bernick, 306 N.C. at 439 , 293 S.E.2d at 408-09 (right to have "issue" of liability to all plaintiffs tried b…
discussed Cited "see" Patton v. Patton (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Poore v. Poore, 75 N.C.App. 414 , 331 S.E.2d 266 , disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 543 , 335 S.E.2d 316 (1985) (good will must be considered and valued in determining value of professional practice for equitable distribution); Phillips v. Phillips, 73 N.C.App. 68 , 326 S.E.2d 57 (1985) (examples of evidence useful in valuing closely-held corporation: gross sales, cost of goods sold, profit, operating expenses, income, retained earnings).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Susan M. POORE
v.
Frank Jefferson POORE.
463P85.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 19, 1985.
335 S.E.2d 316

[*317] Brinkley, Walser, MeGirt, Miller, Smith & Coles, Lexington, for defendant.

Curtis, Millsaps & Chesson, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Defendant's petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. Denied.