Sherrill v. Town of Wrightsville Beach, 349 S.E.2d 600 (N.C. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Sherrill v. Town of Wrightsville Beach, 349 S.E.2d 600 (N.C. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
90 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Banks v. Hunter (ncctapp, 2017-01-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Banks v. Hunter
N.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rice v. Wood , 82 N.C.App. 318 , 326, 346 S.E.2d 205 , 210 (citation omitted), disc. review denied 318 N.C. 417 , 349 S.E.2d 599 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Chavis v. TLC Home Health Care (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schmoyer v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, 81 N.C.App. 140, 142 , 343 S.E.2d 551, 553 , disc. rev. denied, 318 N.C. 417 , 349 S.E.2d 600 (1986); Felton v. Hospital Guild, 57 N.C.App. 33, 34 , 291 S.E.2d 158, 159 , aff'd by an equally divided court, 307 N.C. 121 , 296 S.E.2d 297 (1982); Dunn, 161 N.C.App. at 612 , 589 S.E.2d at 155 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John W. SHERRILL and Joseph T. Walsh
v.
TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, North Carolina, Board of Aldermen of the Town of Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina; Eugene N. Floyd, Individually and as Mayor; Cornielle Sineath, Individually and as Alderman, Frances L. Russ, Individually and as Alderman, Carlton B. Hall, as Alderman and James W. Summey, III, Individually and as Alderman; John T. Nesbitt, Town Building Inspector.
463P86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 7, 1986.
349 S.E.2d 600
Published

James A. MacDonald, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

John W. Sherrill, pro se.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Raleigh, for defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff in this matter pursuant to G.S. § 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant; and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of October 1986."

The Petition for Discretionary Review is:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of October 1986."

[*601] Therefore, it is considered and adjudged further that Plaintiff do pay the sum of Nine and no/100 Dollars ($9.00) and that execution issue therefor.