green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hopkins
(2×)
See Lemmerman v. Williams Oil Co., 318 N.C. 577, 580 , 350 S.E.2d 83, 86 , reh’g denied, 318 N.C. 704 , 351 S.E.2d 736 (1986) (“When the record clearly shows that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking, the Court will take notice and dismiss the action ex mero motu.”') We therefore vacate that portion of the *42 TPR order terminating respondent-father’s parental rights to D.J, for the reasons discussed below.
examined
Cited "see"
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Calco Enterprises
(4×)
See Lemmerman v. Williams Oil Co., 318 N.C. 577 , 350 S.E.2d 83 , reh'g denied, 318 N.C. 704 , 351 S.E.2d 736 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R. Douglas LEMMERMAN, Guardian Ad Litem For Jonathan Shane Tucker, a Minor, and Sulvia A. Tucker
v.
A.T. WILLIAMS OIL COMPANY.
v.
A.T. WILLIAMS OIL COMPANY.
224A86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 29, 1986.
Cited by 17 opinions | Published
[*737] Molitoris & Connolly, Winston-Salem, for plaintiffs.
Nichols, Caffrey, Hill, Evans & Murrelle, Greensboro, for defendant.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C.Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of December 1986."