green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.7 score
“under such a standard of review, it is not enough for the appealing party to show that error occurred in the jury instructions; rather, it must be demonstrated that such error was likely, in light of the entire charge, to mislead the jury.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hughes v. Webster
under such a standard of review, it is not enough for the appealing party to show that error occurred in the jury instructions; rather, it must be demonstrated that such error was likely, in light of the entire charge, to mislead the jury.
cited
Cited "see"
Vandiford v. Stewart Equipment Co.
See Pitman v. Feldspar Corp., 87 N.C.App. 208, 215 , 360 S.E.2d 696, 700 (1987), rev. denied, 321 N.C. 474 , 364 S.E.2d 924 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunter v. Apac/Barrus Const. Co.
See also Pitman v. Feldspar Corp., 87 N.C.App. 208 , 216, 360 S.E.2d 696 , 700 (1987) (holding that the Commission may refuse to believe certain evidence, controverted or not, and may accept or reject the testimony of any witness), disc. review denied, 321 N.C. 474 , 364 S.E.2d 924 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PHARO
v.
CARLYLE
v.
CARLYLE
No. 547P87.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 3, 1988.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 February 1988.