Pinner v. East Carolina Bank, 456 S.E.2d 318 (N.C. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Pinner v. East Carolina Bank, 456 S.E.2d 318 (N.C. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Suarez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (ncwd, 2000-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "but see" Suarez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
W.D.N.C. · 2000 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Phillips v. Winston-Salem Forsyth County Bd. of Educ., 117 N.C.App. 274, 277, 450 S.E.2d 753, 756 (1994), disc. rev. den., 340 N.C. 115 , 456 S.E.2d 318 (1995). "[Wjhen defamatory words are spoken with the intent that the words be reduced to writing (or with television, broadcast), and the words are in fact written (broadcast), the publication is both slander and libel.” Id. at 278, 450 S.E.2d at 756 , quoting Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C.App. 255, 261 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 , disc. rev. den., 327 N.C. 426 , 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990). 2 .
PINNER
v.
EAST CAROLINA BANK
No. 83P95.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 6, 1995.
456 S.E.2d 318
Published

Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 April 1995.