green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.9 score
“collateral estoppel precludes relitigation of an identical issue actually litigated and necessary to the outcome in a prior action that resulted in a final judgment on the merits.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fink v. Fink
collateral estoppel precludes relitigation of an identical issue actually litigated and necessary to the outcome in a prior action that resulted in a final judgment on the merits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tejal Vyas, LLC v. Carriage Park Ltd. Partnership
See Godwin v. Walls, 118 N.C.App. 341, 349 , 455 S.E.2d 473, 480 , disc. rev. allowed, 341 N.C. 419 , 461 S.E.2d 757 (1995) (stating the statute does not require proof of such injury; the plaintiff need only allege an injury).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GODWIN
v.
WALLS
v.
WALLS
No. 179PA95.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 7, 1995.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)
Petition by defendant (Roger Brent Walls) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 7 September 1995.