green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
WRETMAN v. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SYSTEM
(2×)
See Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Indus., Inc., 347 N.C. 329, 331 , 493 S.E.2d 420, 422 (1997), reh’g denied, 347 N.C. 586 , 502 S.E.2d 594 (1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Hill v. Medford
(4×)
See Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Indus., 347 N.C. 329 , 493 S.E.2d 420 (1997), reh'g denied, 347 N.C. 586 , 502 S.E.2d 594 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Kathy W. Knight v. C. D. Vernon
See Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Indus., Inc., 493 S.E.2d 420, 422 (N.C. 1997), reh'g denied, 502 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. 1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Knight v. Vernon
(3×)
See Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Indus., Inc., 493 S.E.2d 420, 422 (N.C. 1997), reh'g denied, 502 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. 1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis KURTZMAN
v.
APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
v.
APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
103PA97.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 5, 1998.
Published
John R. Wester, Frank H. Lancaster, Charlotte, for Applied Analytical Industries.
Gary K. Shipman, Jennifer L. Umbaugh, C. Wes Hodges, II, Wilmington, for Kurtzman.
Thomas J. Manley, Amy E. Simpson, Raleigh, for N.C. Citizens for Business & Industry.
Martha A. Geer, Raleigh, for Academy of Trial Lawyers.
Prior report: 347 N.C. 329, 493 S.E.2d 420.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 1998."