Dawes v. Nash Cnty., 587 S.E.2d 417 (N.C. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Dawes v. Nash Cnty., 587 S.E.2d 417 (N.C. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City of Charlotte, Corp. v. Univ. Fin. Props., LLC (ncctapp, 2016-04-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" City of Charlotte, Corp. v. Univ. Fin. Props., LLC
N.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Dep't of Transp. v. Stagecoach Village, 360 N.C. 46 , 48, 619 S.E.2d 495 , 496 (2005) (citation and quotation marks omitted); see *399 Dep't of Transp. v. Airlie Park, Inc., 156 N.C.App. 63 , 66, 576 S.E.2d 341 , 343 ("Because defendant's present appeal specifically contests the trial court's determination of the area affected by the taking, which is a 'vital preliminary issue,' such appeal is properly before this Court."), appeal dismissed, 357 N.C. 504 , 587 S.E.2d 417 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Dep't of Transp. v. Riddle
N.C. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
Dep't of Transp. v. Stagecoach Village, 360 N.C. 46 , 48, 619 S.E.2d 495 , 496 (2005) (citation and quotation marks omitted); see Dep't of Transp. v. Airlie Park, Inc., 156 N.C.App. 63 , 66, 576 S .E.2d 341 , 343 ("Because defendant's present appeal specifically contests the trial court's determination of the area affected by the taking, which is a 'vital preliminary issue,' such appeal is properly before this Court."), appeal dismissed, 357 N.C. 504 , 587 S.E.2d 417 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dep't of Transp. v. Fernwood Hill Townhome
unknown court · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Dep't of Transp. v. Airlie Park, Inc., 156 *436 N.C.App. 63 , 65-66, 576 S.E.2d 341 , 343 ("Orders from a condemnation hearing concerning title and area taken are `vital preliminary issues' that must be immediately appealed pursuant to section 1-277 of the General Statutes, which permits interlocutory appeals of determinations affecting substantial rights." (quoting Rowe, 351 N.C. at 176 , 521 S.E.2d at 709 )), appeal dismissed, 357 N.C. 504 , 587 S.E.2d 417 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Satorre v. New Hanover County Board of Commissioners (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. 71, 73 , 415 S.E.2d 91, 92 (1992); see also Dawes v. Nash Cty., 357 N.C. 442, 445-46 , 584 S.E.2d 760, 762-63 , reh’g denied, 357 N.C. 511 , 587 S.E.2d 417 (2003) (Our Supreme Court found Nash County’s purchase of the GL section of a policy issued by the same Fund was a waiver of sovereign immunity, unless some specific exclusion applied.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Angela DAWES, Administratrix of the Estate of Effie Hendricks
v.
NASH COUNTY and Nash County Emergency Medical Services, a Division of Nash County.
117A02.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 9, 2003.
587 S.E.2d 417
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

R. Bailey Melvin, Greenville, for Dawes.

[*418] Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Mark A. Davis, Raleigh, for Nash County et al.

Prior report: 357 N.C. 442, 584 S.E.2d 760.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of September 2003."