discussed Cited "see" Jones v. Harrelson & Smith Contractors, LLC P. 10(c)(1) (2006) (emphasis supplied); see State v. Clark, 165 N.C.App. 279, 283 , 598 S.E.2d 213, 217 (even though the defendant objected to the admission of certain evidence at trial, when he did not assign error to the admission of this evidence, the appellate court could not review this issue), disc. rev. denied, 358 N.C. 734 , 601 S.E.2d 866 (2004). "[A]ssignments of error [that are] . . . broad, vague, and unspecific . . . do not comply with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure." Walker v. Walker, 174 N.C.App. 778, 781 , 624 S.E.2d 639, 641 (2005) (quoting In re Appeal of Lan…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jones v. Harrelson and Smith Contractors, LLC P. 10(c)(1); see also Walker v. Walker, 174 N.C.App. 778, 781 , 624 S.E.2d 639, 641 (2005) ("[A]ssignments of error that are ... broad, vague, and unspecific .... do not comply with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure." (Citation and quotation omitted)), *256 disc. rev. denied, 360 N.C. 491 , 632 S.E.2d 774 (2006), cert. denied, 362 N.C. 92 , 657 S.E.2d 31 (2007).