green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cunningham v. Cannon
See Armstrong v. Barnes, 171 N.C.App. 287 , 614 S.E.2d 371 , review denied, 360 N.C. 60 , 621 S.E.2d 173 (2005) (allowing interlocutory appeal of discovery order based on privileges asserted under N.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Myers v. Bbf Printing Solutions
See, e.g., Brooks v. Capstar Corp., 168 N.C.App. 23 , 30-31, 606 S.E.2d 696 , 701, appeal dismissed, 360 N.C. 60 , 621 S.E.2d 170 (2005); Cox v. City of Winston-Salem, 157 N.C.App. 228 , 238, 578 S.E.2d 669 , 677 (2003); Brown, 122 N.C.App. at 477 , 470 S.E.2d at 354 ; Estes, 117 N.C.App. at 129 , 449 S.E.2d at 765 (1994); Poplin v. PPG Indus., 108 N.C.App. 55 , 57-58, 422 S.E.2d 353 , 355 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Forbis
v.
Neal
v.
Neal
No. 079A06.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 6, 2006.
360 N.C. 60
Published
1. Pit’s NOA (Dissent) (COA04-1495)
2. Pit’s PDR as to Additional Issues
3. Def’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal