Iadanza v. Harper, 360 N.C. 63 (N.C. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Iadanza v. Harper, 360 N.C. 63 (N.C. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …it is not the duty of this court to supplement an appellant's brief with legal authority or arguments not contained therein. ⚠ not in text
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Davis v. Woods (ncctapp, 2022-12-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Davis v. Woods
N.C. Ct. App. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is not the duty of this court to supplement an appellant's brief with legal authority or arguments not contained therein.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Davis v. Woods
N.C. Ct. App. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is not the duty of this court to supplement an appellant's brief with legal authority or arguments not contained therein.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Iadanza
v.
Harper
No. 277P05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 6, 2005.
360 N.C. 63
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

Defendant and Counter Claimant’s (Robert N. Hunter, Jr., M.D., and Digestive Diseases Diagnostic Center, P.A.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA04-801)