discussed Cited "see" State v. Jones See State v. Williams, 232 N.C.App. 152 , 159-60, 754 S.E.2d 418 , 424 ("[W]e believe that the Legislature's criminalization of both receiving and possessing such images was not intended merely to provide for the State a position to which to recede when it cannot establish the elements of the greater offense, but rather to prevent or limit two separate harms to the victims of child pornography." (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 367 N.C. 784 , 766 S.E.2d 846 (2014). 3 Because Defendant only challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to …