green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Yak v. BiggerPockets, L.L.C.
Lawyers’ Assoc. v. Dacey, 234 N.E.2d 459, 459 (N.Y. 1967) (noting that “the publication of a multitude of forms for all manner of legal situations is a commonplace activity”); State v. Winder, 348 N.Y.S.2d 270 (App. Div. 1973).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Tomlinson
County Lawyers’ Ass’n, 21 N.Y.2d 694, 694 , 234 N.E.2d 459, 459 , 287 N.Y.S.2d 422, 423 (1967) (finding that “the publication of a legal text which purported to say what the law is ... and that the conjoining of the text and the forms with advice as to how the forms should be filled out does not constitute the unauthorized practice of law.”); State v. Winder, 42 A.D.2d 1039, 1039 , 348 N.Y.S.2d 270, 272 (4th Dept. 1973) (finding that a kit of will forms did not violate New York state’s prohibition against the unauthorized practice of law).
examined
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Christopher L. Lowe, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
(6×)
See New York County Lawyers Association v. Dacey, 21 N.Y.2d 694 , 287 N.Y.S.2d 422 , 234 N.E.2d 459 rev'g., 28 A.D.2d 161 , 283 N.Y.S.2d 984 (1967); Elman, Commr., dissenting in Rodale Press, Inc., et a1. v. Federal Trade Comm., 71 F.T.C. 1184 , 1247-1253 (1967), quoted with approval by Robinson, III, J., concurring in Rodale Press, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 407 F.2d 1252, 1258 (D.C.Cir.1968).
examined
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Unauthorized Practice Committee of the State Bar of Texas
(3×)
See New York County Lawyers’ Ass’n v. Dacey, 28 A.D.2d 161 , 283 N.Y.S. 2d 984 , rev’d and dissenting opinion' adopted, 21 N.Y.2d 694 , 287 N.Y.S.2d 422 , 234 N.E.2d 459 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Perez
(3×)
See Spivak v. Sachs, 16 N.Y.2d 163, 166 , 211 N.E.2d 329, 330 , 263 N.Y.S.2d 953, 955 (1965); see also, New York County Lawyers’ Ass’n v. Dacey, 283 N.Y.S.2d 984, 989-91 , 28 A.D.2d 161, 165-66 (1st Dep’t 1967), rev’d on other grounds, 21 N.Y.2d 694 , 234 N.E.2d 459 , 287 N.Y.S.2d 422 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of New York County Lawyers' Association
v.
Norman F. Dacey
v.
Norman F. Dacey
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 29, 1967.
234 N.E.2d 459
Arthur Stephen Penn for Norman F. Dacey, individually and doing business as the National Estate Planning Council, appellant., James F. Dwyer, Jean G. Lucas and Robert M. Gallagy for Crown Publishers, Inc., and others, appellants., Daniel M. Shientag for respondent.
Cited by 31 opinions | Published
Order reversed and petition dismissed, with costs, on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to affirm on the prevailing opinion at the Appellate Division.