Simmonds v. Sowers, 26 N.E.2d 801 (NY 1940). · Go Syfert
Search
Simmonds v. Sowers, 26 N.E.2d 801 (NY 1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Semi-Tech Litigation, LLC v. Bankers Trust Co. (nysd, 2005-01-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1940 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1940 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Semi-Tech Litigation, LLC v. Bankers Trust Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
LNC Invs., Inc. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.A., 935 F.Supp. 1333, 1346 (S.D.N.Y.1996); accord Hazzard v. Chase Nat’l Bank of the City of New York, 159 Misc. 57, 80-81 , 287 N.Y.S. 541, 566-67 (1936), aff’d, 257 A.D. 950 , 14 N.Y.S.2d 147 (1st Dep't), aff’d, 282 N.Y. 652 , 26 N.E.2d 801 ; Green v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 223 A.D. 12, 15 , 227 N.Y.S. 252, 256 (1st Dep’t 1928), aff’d, 248 N.Y. 627 , 162 N.E. 552 ; N.Y.
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,980
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hazzard v. Chase National Bank, 159 Misc. 57 , 287 N.Y.S. 541 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Cty.1936), aff'd, 257 A.D. 950 , 14 N.Y.S.2d 14 (1st Dep't 1939), aff'd, 282 N.Y. 652 , 26 N.E.2d 801 (1940), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 708 , 61 S.Ct. 319 , 85 L.Ed. 460 (1940). 13 Second, Seligman claims that the indenture provision is an adhesion contract because it only provides for notice by first-class mail, which, Seligman argues, is contrary to what a debenture holder might reasonably expect.
discussed Cited "see" Meckel v. Continental Resources Co.
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hazzard v. Chase National Bank, 159 Misc. 57 , 287 N.Y.S. 541 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Cty.1936), aff'd, 257 A.D. 950 , 14 N.Y.S.2d 14 (1st Dep’t 1939), aff'd, 282 N.Y. 652 , 26 N.E.2d 801 (1940), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 708 , 61 S.Ct. 319 , 85 L.Ed. 460 (1940).
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,956 David Broad v. Rockwell International Corporation (2×)
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hazzard v. Chase National Bank, 159 Misc. 57 , 287 N.Y.S. 541 (Sup.Ct.1936), aff’d mem., 257 A.D. 950 , 14 N.Y.S.2d 147 (1st Dep’t 1939), aff’d mem., 282 N.Y. 652 , 26 N.E.2d 801 , cert. denied, 311 U.S. 708 , 61 S.Ct. 319 , 85 L.Ed. 460 (1940).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Malin v. Deutsch & Frey
N.Y. App. Div. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
"New York cases hold that when a judgment or decree was rendered against the malicious prosecution plaintiff in the prior action of which he complains, that fact is either conclusive or prima facie evidence of probable cause for the prior action, which is not overcome by the subsequent reversal or setting aside of the judgment or decree” (59 NY Jur 2d, False Imprisonment and Malicious Prosecution, §90, at 348; see also, Simmonds v Sowers, 253 App Div 819 , affd 282 NY 651 ; Mesnier v Denike, 82 App Div 404 ; Goldner-Siegel Corp. v Kraemer Hosiery Co., 153 Misc 159 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Claire Simmonds, Appellant,
v.
Martin L. Sowers Et Al., Respondents; Claire Simmonds, Appellant, v. Martin L. Sowers, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 5, 1940.
26 N.E.2d 801
Claire Simmonds, appellant, in person. William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( James Hall Prothero and Paxton Blair of counsel), for Sanford J. Ellsworth, respondent. Martin Luther Sowers, respondent, in person.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

In each action: Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears and Lewis, JJ. Taking no part: Conway, J.