green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“e note that the dissent premises its entire argument on plaintiff's claim that she is now a new york resident, a circumstance which is irrelevant, since plaintiff can avoid the operation of cplr 202 only if she was a new york resident at the time her cause of action accrued.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Holloway v. Holy See
e note that the dissent premises its entire argument on plaintiff's claim that she is now a new york resident, a circumstance which is irrelevant, since plaintiff can avoid the operation of cplr 202 only if she was a new york resident at the time her cause of action accrued.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Pro Camps, Ltd.
Moreover, "CPLR 214-g is a revival statute, and as such must be narrowly construed" ( S.H. v Diocese of Brooklyn , 205 AD3d at 189; see Besser v Squibb & Sons , 146 AD2d 107, 115 , affd 75 NY2d 847 ).
cited
Cited "see"
S.H. v. Diocese of Brooklyn
Litig. , 597 F Supp 740, 815 [ED NY], affd 818 F2d 145 [2d Cir], quoting Hopkins v Lincoln Trust Co. , 233 NY 213, 215 ; see Besser v Squibb & Sons , 146 AD2d 107, 115 , affd 75 NY2d 847 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Karen S. Besser
v.
E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.
v.
E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 15, 1990.
552 N.E.2d 171
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, William D. Fireman and Stuart A. Schlesinger for appellant., David J. Fleming, Robert M. Dato, Nancy Lucas Haniotis, Barry M. Epstein, Marc S. Klein and William B. Korman for E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., respondent., Russel H. Beatie, Jr., Samuel J. Abate, Jr., Susan E. Kelty and Chama L. Gerstenhaber for Eli Lilly & Company, respondent., Jay P. Mayesh and William A. Rome for Upjohn Company, respondent.
Cited by 21 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (146 AD2d 107).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Bellacosa.