Cohan v. Med. Imaging Consultants (supplemental opinion), 297 Neb. 568 (Neb. 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Cohan v. Med. Imaging Consultants (supplemental opinion), 297 Neb. 568 (Neb. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (57 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Hoehn (nebctapp, 2023-12-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hoehn
Neb. Ct. App. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bray, 297 Neb. 916 , 902 N.W.2d 98 (2017) (exclusionary rule is applicable only where - 466 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 32 Nebraska Appellate Reports STATE V.
cited Cited "see" State v. Allen
Neb. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bray, 297 Neb. 916 , 902 N.W.2d 98 (2017).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thompson (2×)
Neb. Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bray, 297 Neb. 916 , 902 N.W.2d 98 (2017). (ii) Attenuation of Thompson’s Consent From Illegal Extension of Traffic Stop [23] In determining whether the causal chain leading to con- sent is sufficiently attenuated from a Fourth Amendment viola- tion to allow for the admission of evidence, we consider three relevant factors: (1) the time elapsed between the constitutional violation and the acquisition of the evidence (temporal proxim- ity), (2) the presence of intervening circumstances, and (3) the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.
discussed Cited "see" Jonas v. Willman (2×)
Neb. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants, 297 Neb. 111 , 900 N.W.2d 732 (2017), modified on denial of rehearing 297 Neb. 568 , 902 N.W.2d 98 .
discussed Cited "see" Jonas v. Willman (2×)
Neb. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants , 297 Neb. 111 , 900 N.W.2d 732 (2017), modified on denial of rehearing 297 Neb. 568 , 902 N.W.2d 98 (2017).
cited Cited "see" State v. Sievers
Neb. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bray, 297 Neb. 916 , 902 N.W.2d 98 (2017).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gonzales v. Nebraska Pediatric Practice (2×)
Neb. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Simmer, supra note 5 . 7 See Ewers v. Saunders County, 298 Neb. 944 , 906 N.W.2d 653 (2018). 8 See, e.g., Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants, 297 Neb. 111 , 900 N.W.2d 732 (2017), modified on denial of rehearing, 297 Neb. 568 , 902 N.W.2d 98 ; Richardson v. Children’s Hosp., 280 Neb. 396 , 787 N.W.2d 235 (2010); Rankin v. Stetson, 275 Neb. 775 , 749 N.W.2d 460 (2008). 9 See Gonzales v. Nebraska Pediatric Practice, 26 Neb.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ferguson
Neb. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, State v. Barbeau , supra note 1. 25 See id. 26 State v. Verling , 269 Neb. 610 , 694 N.W.2d 632 (2005). 27 State v. Rogers , 297 Neb. 265 , 899 N.W.2d 626 (2017). 28 See State v. Petsch , 300 Neb. 401 , 914 N.W.2d 448 (2018). 29 Brief for appellant at 13. 30 County of Riverside v. McLaughlin , 500 U.S. 44 , 111 S.Ct. 1661 , 114 L.Ed.2d 49 (1991). 31 Id. 32 See State v. Bray , 297 Neb. 916 , 902 N.W.2d 98 (2017). 33 Brief for appellant at 13. 34 See State v. Lowery , 23 Neb.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cohan
v.
Medical Imaging Consultants (supplemental opinion)
S-16-145.
Nebraska Supreme Court.
Aug 25, 2017.
297 Neb. 568
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library
www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/
11/22/2017 08:11 PM CST

- 568 -
Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets
297 Nebraska R eports
COHAN v. MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS
Cite as 297 Neb. 568

M ary Cohan and Terry Cohan, individually
and as wife and husband, appellants and
cross-appellees, v.Medical Imaging
Consultants, P.C., et al., appellees
and cross-appellants.
___ N.W.2d ___

Filed August 25, 2017. No. S-16-145.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: James T.

Gleason, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modi- fied. Motions for rehearing overruled.

Richard J. Rensch and Sean P. Rensch, of Rensch & Rensch Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellants.

David D. Ernst and Kellie Chesire Olson, of Pansing, Hogan, Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for appellees Medical Imaging Consultants, P.C., and Robert M. Faulk, M.D.

William R. Settles and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellees Bellevue Obstetrics and Gynecology Associates, P.C., et al.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, and K elch, JJ.

- 569 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports COHAN v. MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS Cite as 297 Neb. 568

Per Curiam. We consider the appellees’ motions for rehearing concern- ing our opinion in Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants.1 We overrule the motions, but we modify the original opinion as follows: In the section of the opinion designated “3. Cross-Appeals by Appellees,” we add a sentence at the end of the first paragraph,2 such that the paragraph reads as follows: Appellees’ cross-appeals assign as error the admission of Dr. Naughton’s testimony. Appellees moved to strike Dr. Naughton’s testimony because they claimed that only Mary’s prognosis at the time of trial was relevant and that Nebraska did not recognize a theory of recovery based upon loss of chance. The district court, in overruling the motions to strike, found that Dr. Naughton’s opinion was relevant for the limited purpose of establishing that early discovery of cancer leads to a better prognosis. We understand the district court to have used “prognosis” to refer to the risk of recurrence and the probability of an improved outcome. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. Funke, J., not participating.

 1 Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants, ante p. 111, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2017).  2 Id. at 129-130, ___ N.W.2d at ___.