Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Just. v. Cline, 2014 OK 91 (Okla. 2014). · Go Syfert
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Just. v. Cline, 2014 OK 91 (Okla. 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: CATHEY v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MCCURTAIN COUNTY (okla, 2023-11-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) CATHEY v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MCCURTAIN COUNTY (3×) also: Cited "see"
Okla. · 2023 · confidence medium
Coalition for Reproductive Justice v. Cline , 2014 OK 91, ¶ 1, 339 P.3d 887.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE (2×)
Okla. · 2016 · confidence medium
Justice v. Cline , 2014 OK 91, ¶ 1, 339 P.3d 887.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice
v.
Cline
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Nov 4, 2014.
2014 OK 91
Published

Opinion

OSCN Found Document:OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE
  1. Home
  2. Courts
  3. Court Dockets
  4. Legal Research
  5. Calendar
  6. Help
  1. Previous Case
  2. Top Of Index
  3. This Point in Index
  4. Citationize
  5. Next Case
  6. Print Only

OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE
2014 OK 91
Case Number: 113355
Decided: 11/04/2014
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA


Cite as: 2014 OK 91, __ P.3d __

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.


Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, on behalf of itself and its members, and Nova Health Systems, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its members, Appellants,
v.
Terry L. Cline, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health, and Lyle Kelsey, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

¶1 This opinion addresses only the trial court's denial of a temporary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of House Bill 2684, 2014 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 121 (effective November 1, 2014) (Act). Appellant's constitutional challenge to the enactment remains pending in the trial court. Upon consideration of "Appellant's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Injunction or, in the Alternative, an Emergency Stay of the District Court's Order to Preserve the Status Quo", and pursuant to the authority provided by Article 7, section 4, of the Oklahoma Constitution, this Court temporarily enjoins enforcement of the Act until the constitutionality of the Act is fully and finally litigated.

¶2 This matter is remanded to the trial court for determination of the constitutional challenge to the Act to be memorialized by findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court expresses no opinion concerning the validity of the Act.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
None Found.
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
None Found.

Opinion

OSCN Found Document:OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE
  1. Home
  2. Courts
  3. Court Dockets
  4. Legal Research
  5. Calendar
  6. Help
  1. Previous Case
  2. Top Of Index
  3. This Point in Index
  4. Citationize
  5. Next Case
  6. Print Only

OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. CLINE
2014 OK 91
Case Number: 113355
Decided: 11/04/2014
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA


Cite as: 2014 OK 91, __ P.3d __

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.


Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, on behalf of itself and its members, and Nova Health Systems, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its members, Appellants,
v.
Terry L. Cline, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health, and Lyle Kelsey, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

¶1 This opinion addresses only the trial court's denial of a temporary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of House Bill 2684, 2014 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 121 (effective November 1, 2014) (Act). Appellant's constitutional challenge to the enactment remains pending in the trial court. Upon consideration of "Appellant's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Injunction or, in the Alternative, an Emergency Stay of the District Court's Order to Preserve the Status Quo", and pursuant to the authority provided by Article 7, section 4, of the Oklahoma Constitution, this Court temporarily enjoins enforcement of the Act until the constitutionality of the Act is fully and finally litigated.

¶2 This matter is remanded to the trial court for determination of the constitutional challenge to the Act to be memorialized by findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court expresses no opinion concerning the validity of the Act.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
None Found.
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
None Found.