Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445 (Alaska 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445 (Alaska 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vazquez v. Campbell (alaska, 2006-07-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vazquez v. Campbell
Alaska · 2006 · confidence medium
Pain Clinic, Inc., 81 P.3d 989, 1011 (Alaska 2003); Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc., 71 P.3d 845, 849 (Alaska 2003); Arctic Slope Native Ass'n v. Paul, 609 P.2d 32, 38 (Alaska 1980); Gregory v. Sauser, 574 P.2d 445, 445 (Alaska 1978) (reviewing award of attorney's fees in case handled by Alaska Legal Services Corporation). 9 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc.
Alaska · 2003 · confidence medium
Arctic Slope Native Ass'n v. Paul, 609 P.2d 32, 38 (Alaska 1980) (discussing Gregory v. Sauser, 574 P.2d 445, 445 (Alaska 1978)). 9 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Amos v. State
Alaska · 2002 · confidence medium
See Hallam v. Holland America Line, Inc., 27 P.3d 751, 753 (Alaska 2001) (reviewing denial of leave to amend); see also C.L. v. P.C.S., 17 P.3d 769, 771 (Alaska 2001) (reviewing motion to consolidate); Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445, 446-47 (Alaska 1978) (reviewing motion for continuance). .
cited Cited as authority (rule) United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Pruitt Ex Rel. Pruitt
Alaska · 2001 · confidence medium
Id. at 445. 12 . 600 P.2d 743 (Alaska 1979). 13 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cassell v. State
Alaska Ct. App. · 1982 · confidence medium
Byrd v. State, 626 P.2d 1057, 1058 (Alaska 1980); Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445,446 (Alaska 1978); City of Anchorage v. Nesbett, 530 P.2d 1324, 1336 (Alaska 1975). 1 Because it is proper at the trial court level to receive hearsay when no objection has been made, application of the plain error doctrine will rarely, if ever, be appropriate on this issue at the appellate level.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jimmie v. Alaska Village Electric Co-op, Inc.
Alaska · 1981 · confidence medium
Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445, 446-47 (Alaska 1978); Doe v. State, 487 P.2d 47, 57 (Alaska 1971).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hayes v. State
Alaska · 1978 · confidence medium
Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445, 446 (Alaska 1978); City of Anchorage v. Nesbett, 530 P.2d 1324, 1336 (Alaska 1975).
cited Cited "see" Okagawa v. Yaple
Alaska · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gregory v. Sauser, 574 P.2d 445, 445 (Alaska 1978); Doyle v. Peabody, 781 P.2d 957, 962-63 (Alaska 1989); United Servs.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Northwestern Construction, Inc. (2×)
Alaska · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445, 446 (Alaska 1978). [7] C.
discussed Cited "see" Sanguinetti v. Sanguinetti (2×)
Alaska · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reese v. Geiermann, 574 P.2d 445 (Alaska 1978) (continuance); Bowman v. Hall, 83 Ariz. 56 , 316 P.2d 484, 486-87 (1957) (re-opening of trial) and cases cited therein.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sisters of Providence v. A.A. Pain Clinic, Inc.
Alaska · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Id.; see also Gregory, 574 P.2d at 445. 76 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morris G. REESE, Appellant,
v.
Louis J. GEIERMANN and Regal, Inc., Appellees
3332.
Alaska Supreme Court.
Feb 10, 1978.
574 P.2d 445
Lawrence J. Kulik, Anchorage, for appellant., Chancy Croft, Croft, Thurlow, Loutrel & Duggan, Anchorage, for appellees.
Boochever, Witz, Connor, Burke, Matthews.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, and RABINO WITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and ' MATTHEWS, Justices. MATTHEWS, Justice.

The principal question in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in valuing real property which appellant had wrongfully conveyed. The court’s finding of value was in accordance with a written estimate of a real estate appraiser which was introduced into evidence without objection. [1] The report was hearsay, but since it was not objected to the court did not err in admitting or relying on it. “Hearsay testimony which is not objected to is fully competent.” City of Anchorage v. Nesbett, 530 P.2d 1324, 1336 (Alaska 1975).

Appellant also contends that the appraiser’s report was predicated on an assumption that any sale of the property would be on an installment basis rather than for cash and that it was therefore plain error for the court to rely on the report. We have held that “we shall consider plain errors, even though not objected to below, which are so substantial as to result in injustice.” Merrill v. Faltin, 430 P.2d 913, 917 (Alaska 1967). We find no plain error. The report does not specify whether the estimate of value assumed a cash or installment sale, and no evidence was presented at trial that there would be any difference in value under the two assumptions for the type of real estate involved.

Appellant also contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a continuance and motion to amend the judgment. Those orders may not be disturbed on appeal unless there has been an abuse of[*447] discretion by the trial court. [2] We find no abuse of discretion with regard to the court’s denial of either motion.

AFFIRMED.

1

. No evidence that the property had a value lower than that contained in the appraiser’s report was presented at trial. Appellee Louis J. Geiermann testified to a somewhat higher value, also without objection.

2

. Concerning a motion to amend a judgment under Civil Rule 59(f), “the same appellate review for legal error is available, on appeal from the judgment, as is available relative to motions for a new trial.” 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 59.15[4], at 59-294 (2d Ed. 1974). The standard of review of new trial motions is that we will reverse only in cases of abuse of discretion. Ahlstrom v. Cummings, 388 P.2d 261, 262 (Alaska 1964). The same standard applies to motions for a continuance. Gregoire v. National Bank of Alaska, 413 P.2d 27, 33 (Alaska 1966).