green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bouwkamp v. State
(2×)
State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , 767 P.2d 1308, 1314 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Coyote
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , Syl. ¶ 1, 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Barksdale
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , Syl. 1, 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smallwood
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , Syl. ¶ 1, 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
(2×)
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , Syl. ¶ 1, 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hickles
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , Syl. ¶ 1, 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Swafford
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292, 298-99 , 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Reed
(2×)
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , Syl. ¶ 1, 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
(2×)
See State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292, 297 , 767 P.2d 1308, 1313 (1989); State v. Lucas, 243 Kan. 462, 471 , 759 P.2d 90, 99 (1988); see also State v. Hunter, 35 Wash.App. 708, 713 , 669 P.2d 489, 494 (1983) (“anti-merger” statute precludes the application of the merger doctrine).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wesson
(2×)
See State v. Lucas, 243 Kan. 462 , 759 P.2d 90 (1988), aff d 244 Kan. 193 , 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mitchell
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Lucas, 243 Kan. 462, 466 , 759 P.2d 90 (1988), aff’d on reh. 244 Kan. 193 , 767 P.2d 1308 (1989), (“Clearly, all of the crimes specifically designated [in K.S.A. 21-3110(8)] would supply the requisite underlying felony for a felony-murder conviction unless the doctrine of merger applies.”); and State v. Strauch, 239 Kan. 203, 216 , 718 P.2d 613 (1986), where aggravated criminal sodomy was held to be an inherently dangerous felony to support a felony-murder charge (“The underlying felony in the felony-murder rule must be a forcible felony, one inherently dangerous to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Campos
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , 767 P.2d 1308, 1313 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pierce
See State v. Boeglin; see also State v. Prouse, 244 Kan. 292 , 767 P.2d 1308 (1989).
State of Kansas, Appellee,
v.
Robert Lynn Lucas, Appellant
v.
Robert Lynn Lucas, Appellant
60,939.
Supreme Court of Kansas.
Jan 20, 1989.
Karen Mayberry, assistant appellate defender, argued the cause, and Rosanne Piatt, assistant appellate defender, and Benjamin C. Wood, chief appellate defender, were on the briefs for appellant., Dennis-W. Moore, district attorney, argued the cause, and Michael B. Buser, assistant district attorney, and Robert T. Stephan, attorney general, were with him on the brief for appellee.
McFarland, Miller, Six, Herd.
Cited by 23 opinions | Published
The opinion of the court was delivered by
In our original opinion, defendant’s conviction of the child abuse of Shannon Woodside was affirmed, and his convictions of felony murder and child abuse of Shaina Wood-side were reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings. Subsequently, the State filed a motion for rehearing. The motion was granted on August 26, 1988.
The case was reargued on December 8, 1988. After due consideration, we affirm our original opinion.