green
Positive treatment
8.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brown v. Beazley USA Services, Inc.
In Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines P’ship, 177 P.3d 232, 243 (Cal. 2008), the 5 California Supreme Court foreclosed personal liability for non-employer individuals under FEHA’s 6 retaliation statute.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hammond v. County of Los Angeles
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
In Jones, supra, the court did note Justice Moreno's argument "that a supervisor who is liable for harassment should also be liable for retaliation against someone who opposes or reports that harassment," but said that "[t]his case does not present that situation." ( Id. at p. ___, fn. 4, 72 Cal. Rptr.3d at 631, fn. 4 , 177 P.3d at 239, fn. 4 .) In doing so, the court acknowledged that it was not addressing the argument raised here by plaintiff that distinguishes between reports of or opposition to discrimination and reports of or opposition to harassment.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership
However, contrary to the majority's assertion (maj. opn., ante, 72 Cal.Rptr.3d at p. 631, fn. 4 , 177 P.3d at p. 239, fn. 4 ), this does not alter the analysis.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raines v. Front Porch Communities and Services
See Jones v. Lodge At Torrey Pines P’ship, 177 P.3d 232 (Cal. 1 2008) (holding that an employer may be liable for retaliation under FEHA, “but 2 nonemployer individual may not be held personally liable for their role in that retaliation”); 3 Reno, 957 P.2d at 1348 ; Janken, 53 Cal. Rptr. 2d at 78 .
examined
Cited "see"
Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.
(3×)
See Jones, 42 Cal.4th at 1160, 1164 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 177 P.3d 232 .
cited
Cited "see"
Weeks v. Union Pacific Railroad
See Jones, 42 Cal.4th at 1168 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 177 P.3d 232 ; McRae, 142 Cal.App.4th at 386 , 48 Cal.Rptr.3d 313 ; see also Lambdin, 2015 WL 263569 , at *3-4, 2015 U.S. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Lopez
(See Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (2004) 34 Cal.4th 733, 737 [ 21 Cal.Rptr.3d 676 , 101 P.3d 563 ] [“[i]f the statutory language permits more than one reasonable interpretation, courts may consider other aids, such as the statute’s purpose, legislative history, and public policy”]; accord, Bruns, supra, 51 Cal.4th at p. 724 ; see Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership (2008) 42 Cal.4th 1158, 1162-1163 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 177 P.3d 232 ] (Jones) [“statutory language is not plain” where its “language does lend itself to plaintiff’s interpret…
discussed
Cited "see"
Starbucks Corp. v. Superior Court
“It is a well-settled maxim of statutory construction that ‘a statute is to be construed in such a way as to render it “reasonable, fair and harmonious with [its] manifest [legislative] purposes . . . .” [citations], and the literal meaning of its words must give way to avoid harsh results and mischievous or absurd consequences.’ ” (Kinney v. Vaccari (1980) 27 Cal.3d 348, 357 [ 165 Cal.Rptr. 787 , 612 P.2d 877 ] [interpreting “tenant” in a statute that allowed each “tenant” who was willfully deprived of utility services to recover actual damages, plus $100 per day, to joint…
discussed
Cited "see"
Grosz v. Lassen Community College District
See Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership, 42 Cal.4th 1158, 1173 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 177 P.3d 232 (2008); See also Reno v. Baird, 18 Cal.4th 640, 644-45 , 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 499 , 957 P.2d 1333 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc.
Normally, we do not think a statement of a later-sitting legislator sheds much light on "the intent of an earlier Legislature's enactment." ( Western Security Bank v. Superior Court (1997) 15 Cal.4th 232 , 244, 62 Cal.Rptr.2d 243 , 933 P.2d 507 ["there is little logic and some incongruity in the notion that one Legislature may speak authoritatively on the intent of an earlier Legislature's enactment when a gulf of decades separates the two bodies"]; see also, Jones , supra , 42 Cal.4th at p. 1171 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 177 P.3d 232 ["The declaration of a later Legislature is of little weight i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grosz v. Lassen Community College District
See Reno v. Baird, 18 Cal.4th 640, 646-47 , 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 499 , 957 P.2d 1333 (1998); see also Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines P’ship, 42 Cal.4th 1158, 1173-74 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 177 P.3d 232 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP
Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization, 19 Cal.4th 1, 11 , 78 Cal. Rptr.2d 1 , 960 P.2d 1031 (1998); see also Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership, 42 Cal.4th 1158, 1173 , 72 Cal. Rptr.3d 624 , 177 P.3d 232 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
STEVENS (Lorenzo).
v.
STEVENS (Lorenzo).
S158852.
California Supreme Court.
Feb 13, 2008.
George.
Published
Petition for review granted (criminal case).
GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, WERDEGAR, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.