green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Martin
See State v. Plueard, 297 Or App 592, 595 , 443 P3d 1195 (2019) (reaching the same result).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Plueard
See State v. Plueard, 291 Or App 842 , 419 P3d 816 , vac’d and rem’d, 363 Or 599 (2018) (Plueard I); see also State v. Plueard, 296 Or App 580 , 439 P3d 556 (Plueard II), adh’d to as modified on recons, 297 Or App 592 , 443 P3d 1195 (Plueard III) (2019).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the MATTER OF K. H., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. State of Oregon
v.
K. H.
v.
K. H.
A168959.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jul 10, 2019.
Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant., Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Egan, Ortega, Powers.
Published
PER CURIAM
[*491] Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the trial court erred because the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is "[u]nable to provide for basic personal needs that are necessary to avoid serious physical harm in the near future, and is not receiving such care as is necessary to avoid such harm." ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support appellant's commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.
Reversed.