State v. Throneberry, 81 P.3d 120 (Wash. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Throneberry, 81 P.3d 120 (Wash. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“justice is not done if hurried defaults are allowed, but neither is it done if continuing delays are permitted.”
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Showalter v. Wild Oats (washctapp, 2004-11-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Showalter v. Wild Oats
Wash. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
justice is not done if hurried defaults are allowed, but neither is it done if continuing delays are permitted.
discussed Cited "see" Rosander v. Nightrunners Transport, Ltd.
Wash. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson v. Cash Store, 116 Wash.App. 833, 847-49 , 68 P.3d 1099 (2003) (upholding trial court's holding that neglect was inexcusable based on credibility determination and weight of evidence), review denied, 150 Wash.2d 1020 , 81 P.3d 120 (2003). ¶ 29 Courts determine excusable neglect on a case-by-case basis.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Little v. King
Wash. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Johnson v. Cash Store, 116 Wash.App. 833, 847 , 68 P.3d 1099 (defendant's need to investigate its own employees to determine relevant facts did not support vacation of default judgment because the defendant "held the keys to its own defense"), review denied, 150 Wash.2d 1020 , 81 P.3d 120 (2003). ¶ 49 Contrary to the majority's reasoning, even a cursory review of the facts here makes it clear that Calhoun , not Waxman, applies in this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Throneberry, In re Pers. Restraint of Throneberry
No. 74119-1.
Washington Supreme Court.
Dec 2, 2003.
81 P.3d 120
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Washington (1)

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 28167-8-II, 28977-6-II, May 20, 2003, 116 Wn. App. 1078. Granted on a limited issue December 2, 2003. Case dismissed by order of the Supreme Court May 19, 2004.