green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Mccullough, K.
See Commonwealth v. McCullough, 924 A.2d 695 (Pa. Super. 2007) (unpublished memorandum), appeal denied, 927 A.2d 623 (Pa. 2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Love, W.
See a/so Commonwealth v. Morgan, 913 A.2d 906, 912 (Pa. Super. 2006), appeal denied, 927 A.2d 623 (Pa. 2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Alexander, K.
See Commonwealth v. Roser, 914 A.2d 447 (Pa.Super. 2006), appeal denied, 592 Pa. 788 , 927 A.2d 624 (2007) (stating appellant who challenges discretionary aspects of sentence shall set forth in brief concise statement of reasons relied upon for allowance of appeal per Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f); failure to include Rule 2119(f) statement does not automatically waive appellant’s argument where Commonwealth does not object to such deficiency). - 16 - J-S43045-15 consider Appellant’s lack of remorse upon resentencing; (issue 4)6 court administration transferred Appellant’s case to this jurist’s doc…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Mentzer
See Commonwealth v. Roser, 914 A.2d 447, 454-455 (Pa.Super.2006), appeal denied, 592 Pa. 788 , 927 A.2d 624 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Reyes, T.
(2×)
See e.g., Commonwealth v. Morgan, 913 A.2d 906, 910 (Pa. Super. 2006) (emphasis in original) (“[O]nce Appellant contacts or communicates with the minor for the purpose of engaging in the prohibited activity, the crime of unlawful contact with a minor has been completed.”), appeal denied, 592 Pa. 788 , 927 A.2d 623 (2007); Commonwealth v. Evans, 901 A.2d 528, 537 (Pa. Super. 2006) (defendant need not successfully complete purpose of contact or communication with minor; once contact or communication for purpose of engaging in prohibited activity occurs, “crime of unlawful contact with a mi…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Reed
(4×)
See e.g., Commonwealth v. Morgan, 913 A.2d 906, 910 (Pa.Super.2006)(emphasis in original) (“[O]nce Appellant contacts or communicates with the minor for the purpose of engaging in the prohibited activity, the crime of unlawful contact with a minor has been completed.”), appeal denied, 592 Pa. 788 , 927 A.2d 623 (2007); Commonwealth v. Evans, 901 A.2d 528, 537 (Pa.Super.2006) (defendant need not successfully complete purpose of contact or communication with minor; once contact or communication for purpose of engaging in prohibited activity occurs, “crime of unlawful contact with a minor h…
Com.
v.
Morgan.
v.
Morgan.
636 EAL (2006).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 26, 2007.
Cited by 19 opinions | Published
Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeals Denied.