Moyd v. Johnson, 347 S.E.2d 97 (S.C. 1986). · Go Syfert
Moyd v. Johnson, 347 S.E.2d 97 (S.C. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Wilson (sc, 2010-05-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Wilson (2×)
S.C. · 2010 · confidence medium
Corp., 289 S.C. 480, 481 , 347 S.E.2d 97, 97 (1986). *600 "The determination of whether a party may immediately appeal an order issued before or during trial is governed primarily by [section 14-3-330 of the South Carolina Code]." Hagood, 362 S.C. at 195 , 607 S.E.2d at 708 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Skinner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
S.C. · 2008 · confidence medium
Corp., 289 S.C. 480, 481 , 347 S.E.2d 97, 97 (1986) (rejecting an attempt to invoke a rule of civil procedure as a basis of the right to appeal and holding, “[t]he right of appeal arises from and is controlled by statutory law”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hubbard v. Owens
S.C. · 2007 · confidence medium
We affirm the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Johnson v. South Carolina Dep’t of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services , __ S.C. __, 641 S.E.2d 895, 897 (2007) (providing that this Court will not entertain the merits of an issue on appeal where the record on appeal is inadequate for review); Woodard v. Westvaco Corp. , 319 S.C. 240, 242-43 , 460 S.E.2d 392, 393-94 (1995) (providing that the denial of a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order which is not immediately appealable); Ballenger v. Bowen , 313 S.C. 476, 477-7…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hagood v. Sommerville (2×)
S.C. · 2005 · confidence medium
Corp., 289 S.C. 480, 481 , 347 S.E.2d 97, 97 (1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rose v. Thrash
S.C. · 1987 · confidence medium
In Moyd v. Johnson, 289 S. C. 482, 347 S. E. (2d) 97 (1986), we held that the denial of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, is not directly appealable.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Huntley v. Young (2×)
S.C. · 1995 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Moyd v. Johnson, 289 S.C. 482 , 347 S.E. (2d) 97 (1986) with Hite v. Thomas & Howard Co., 305 S.C. 358 , 409 S.E. (2d) 340 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pickens K. MOYD, M.D., Respondent
v.
Mordecai C. JOHNSON and Frank E. Cain, Jr., Appellants
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jun 6, 1986.
347 S.E.2d 97
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

This is an appeal of a circuit court order which overruled a motion to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, for failure to state a cause of action. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal.

We hold that the denial of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is not directly appealable under S. C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330 (1976). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice.

It is so ordered.