green
Positive treatment
10.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Wilson
(2×)
Corp., 289 S.C. 480, 481 , 347 S.E.2d 97, 97 (1986). *600 "The determination of whether a party may immediately appeal an order issued before or during trial is governed primarily by [section 14-3-330 of the South Carolina Code]." Hagood, 362 S.C. at 195 , 607 S.E.2d at 708 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Skinner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Corp., 289 S.C. 480, 481 , 347 S.E.2d 97, 97 (1986) (rejecting an attempt to invoke a rule of civil procedure as a basis of the right to appeal and holding, “[t]he right of appeal arises from and is controlled by statutory law”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hubbard v. Owens
We affirm the trial courts decision pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Johnson v. South Carolina Dept of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services , __ S.C. __, 641 S.E.2d 895, 897 (2007) (providing that this Court will not entertain the merits of an issue on appeal where the record on appeal is inadequate for review); Woodard v. Westvaco Corp. , 319 S.C. 240, 242-43 , 460 S.E.2d 392, 393-94 (1995) (providing that the denial of a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order which is not immediately appealable); Ballenger v. Bowen , 313 S.C. 476, 477-7…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hagood v. Sommerville
(2×)
Corp., 289 S.C. 480, 481 , 347 S.E.2d 97, 97 (1986).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rose v. Thrash
In Moyd v. Johnson, 289 S. C. 482, 347 S. E. (2d) 97 (1986), we held that the denial of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, is not directly appealable.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huntley v. Young
(2×)
Compare Moyd v. Johnson, 289 S.C. 482 , 347 S.E. (2d) 97 (1986) with Hite v. Thomas & Howard Co., 305 S.C. 358 , 409 S.E. (2d) 340 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pickens K. MOYD, M.D., Respondent
v.
Mordecai C. JOHNSON and Frank E. Cain, Jr., Appellants
v.
Mordecai C. JOHNSON and Frank E. Cain, Jr., Appellants
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jun 6, 1986.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
ORDER
This is an appeal of a circuit court order which overruled a motion to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, for failure to state a cause of action. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal.
We hold that the denial of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is not directly appealable under S. C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330 (1976). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice.
It is so ordered.