green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven Ray LAWSON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden, Respondent-Appellant
(2×)
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851, 855 (9th Cir.1980) (nine hours of deliberation deemed protracted), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); see also Dallago v. United States, 427 F.2d 546, 559 (D.C.Cir.1969) (five days protracted). 30 Furthermore, the extrinsic information directly related to a material issue in the case: intent.
cited
Cited "see"
Diaz v. State
See Malone v. State, 390 So.2d 338 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1034 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); see also Kuhlmann v. Wilson, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2616 , 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spain v. Rushen
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851, 854 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); see also Section III., A., 1. of this Opinion, supra. No record was made of the conversations between judge and juror at the time they occurred, and the private nature of those discussions prevented the resultant interference with the normal functions of Spain’s lawyer from being “readily apparent on the record.” Cooper v. Fitzharris, supra, 586 F.2d at 1332 ; Slappy v. Morris, supra, 649 F.2d at 723 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick Gallagher
(2×)
See Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851, 855 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Barnes
See, e.g., Gibson v. Clanon, 633 F.2d 851 (9th Cir.1980) (jury consulted medical text concerning blood types and medication), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); Kirby v. Rosell, 133 Ariz. 42 , 648 P.2d 1048 (1982) (jury consulted business law text); Alvarez v. People, 653 P.2d 1127 (Colo.1982) (jury consulted dictionary); Brockie v. Omo Construction, Inc., 255 Mont. 495 , 844 P.2d 61 (1992) (jury consulted library books dealing with subject of technical expert's testimony).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald Dickson v. G.E. Sullivan, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution
A defendant is entitled to a new trial when the jury obtains or uses evidence that has not been introduced during trial if there is “a reasonable possibility that the extrinsic material could have affected the verdict.” Id. (emphasis in original), quoting United States v. Vasquez, 597 F.2d 192, 193 (9th Cir.1979) (Vasquez); see also Gibson v. Clanen, 633 F.2d 851 , 855 (9th Cir.1980) (Gibson), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1035 , 101 S.Ct. 1749 , 68 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clanon, Superintendent, California Medical Facility at Vacaville
v.
Gibson
v.
Gibson
No. 80-1339.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1981.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.