Barmat v. Robertson, 449 U.S. 894 (1980). · Go Syfert
Barmat v. Robertson, 449 U.S. 894 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clifton v. Borough of Eddystone (paed, 2011-10-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Clifton v. Borough of Eddystone
E.D. Pa. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Bryner, 652 A.2d 909, 911 (Pa.Super.Ct.1995) (citing Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo, 414 A.2d 54 (Pa.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980)).
discussed Cited "see" Blanco v. State
Tex. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo, 414 A.2d 54 , 489 Pa. 254 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980); Reeves v. McConn, 631 F.2d 377 (5th Cir.1980); Pringle v. Court of Common Pleas, 778 F.2d 998 (3rd Cir.1985) discussing Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo, supra. Appellant alternatively argues that the statute could impact commercial speech, much like a public address system or reli *41 gious service.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Haines
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo, 489 Pa. 254 , 414 A.2d 54 , appeal dismissed, Mastrangelo v. Pennsylvania, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980); Commonwealth v. Ilgenfritz, 466 Pa. 345 , 353 A.2d 387 (1976); Commonwealth v. Pritchard, 270 Pa.Super. 461 , 411 A.2d 810 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Packer (2×)
Pa. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo, 489 Pa. 254 , 414 A.2d 54, 56 (1980), appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980); Waste Conversion, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 130 Pa.Cmwlth. 443 , 568 A.2d 738, 741 (1990), pet. for allowance of appeal denied, 525 Pa. 621 , 577 A.2d 892 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 898 , 111 S.Ct. 253 , 112 L.Ed.2d 211 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bloomsburg Landlords Ass'n v. Town of Bloomsburg
M.D. Penn. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo, 489 Pa. 254 , 414 A.2d 54 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (Pennsylvania disorderly conduct statute survived a First Amendment challenge with the court concluding that it was neither over-broad nor vague); and Earley v. State of Alaska, (Alaska anti-noise statute not overly broad or unconstitutionally vague).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Houghton v. Franscell
Wyo. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Record-Times, 650 P.2d at 301 n. 4 (citing Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for the County of Norfolk, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980); Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368 , 99 S.Ct. 2898 , 61 L.Ed.2d 608 (1979)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Eanes v. State (2×)
Md. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Mastrangelo, 489 Pa. 254 , 414 A.2d 54 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Globe Newspaper Co. v. Pokaski
D. Mass. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 379 Mass. 846, 862-63 , 401 N.E.2d 360 remanded 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980), aff'd 383 Mass. 838 , 423 N.E.2d 773 (1981), rev'd 457 U.S. 596 , 102 S.Ct. 2613 , 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982) (in statute providing that "the presiding justice shall exclude the general public" from sex offense trials, the word "shall” construed as imposing mandatory obligation).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." City of Miami Springs v. JJT, INC.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Barmat v. Robertson, 125 Ariz. 514 , 611 P.2d 101 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980), appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 894 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 124 (1980); Wright v. Town of Huxley, 249 N.W.2d 672 (Iowa 1977); Boston Licensing Board v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission, 367 Mass. 788 , 328 N.E.2d 848 (1975); Mazza v. Cavicchia, 15 N.J. 498 , 105 A.2d 545 (1954). [1] In essence, then, it is well recognized in the area of liquor legislation, as elsewhere, that if any "reasonable argument exists on the question of whether an ordinance is arbitrary or unreasonable, the legislative will must pre…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 249 v. Western Pennsylvania Motor Carriers Association (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Engine Specialties, Inc. v. Bombardier Limited, 605 F.2d 1, 20 (1st Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 983 , 101 S.Ct. 259 , 66 L.Ed.2d 123 (1980); Vuitton et Fils S. A. v. Carousel Handbags, 592 F.2d 126, 130-31 (2d Cir. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barmat
v.
Robertson, Superintendent, Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
No. 80-173.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1980.
449 U.S. 894
Published

Appeal from Ct. App. Ariz. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.