green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Theresa H. Wood v. United States of America, Charles D. Owens, Theresa H. Wood v. United States
See Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1256 (D.C.Cir. 1980) (“doctrine of immunity assumes official error”), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 242 , 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1689 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (“Implicit in the idea that officials have some immunity ... is a recognition that they may err.”); see also Heidelberg v. Hammer, 577 F.2d 429, 432 (7th Cir.1978) (distinguishing the defense of “absolute immunity” from “failure to state a claim”).
cited
Cited "see"
Halperin v. Kissinger
See Keith, 407 U.S. at 322 , 92 S.Ct. at 2139 ; accord Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1262 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher
See United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980) (a group of bettors linked to a group of jockeys through the defendant constitute an enterprise where all were acting with the purpose of “fixing” horse races), cert denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Jim Forno's Continental Motors, Inc. v. Subaru Distributors Corp.
See United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniel Ellsberg, v John N. Mitchell
(2×)
See Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1260-61 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981); Halperin v. Kissinger, 606 F.2d 1192, 1204-05 (D.C.Cir.1979), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 452 U.S. 713 , 101 S.Ct. 3132 , 69 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Mazzei
(2×)
See United States v. Erri co, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vanover v. Hantman
See also Chagnon v. Bell, 468 F.Supp. 927, 933 (D.D.C.1979) (holding that declaratory judgment is appropriate if challenged government activity is “continuing” and “casts what may well be a substantial adverse effect upon the interests of the petitioning parties.”) (citation and internal quotations omitted), aff'd, 642 F.2d 1248 (D.C.Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clyde E. Williamson, D/B/A Triangle 44 Farms v. United States Department of Agriculture
See also Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248, 1265-66 (D.C.Cir.1980) (rejecting claim of abuse of discretion based on stay of discovery in case against federal officials), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Castellano
See, e.g., United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981); Jury Instructions, supra, H 52.04 at 52-36.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Halperin v. Kissinger
As late as 1972 the Supreme Court had “declined to delineate ‘precise standards for domestic security warrants.’ ” Id. at 169, quoting United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 , 92 S.Ct. 2125 , 32 L.Ed.2d 752 (1972); see also Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Halperin v. Kissinger
As late as 1972 the Supreme Court had "declined to delineate `precise standards for domestic security warrants.'" Id. at 169, quoting United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 , 92 S.Ct. 2125 , 32 L.Ed.2d 752 (1972); see also Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. Newman
See also United States v. Errico, 635 F.2d 152, 156 (2d Cir.1980) (a network *23 of jockeys and bettors, who joined together for the single illegal purpose of betting on “fixed” horseraces, constituted an “enterprise” for the purposes of RICO), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981).
Engle, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Isaac Perini, Correctional Superintendent v. Bell and Engle, Correctional Superintendent v. Hughes
v.
Isaac Perini, Correctional Superintendent v. Bell and Engle, Correctional Superintendent v. Hughes
No. 80-1430.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 29, 1981.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 451 U. S. 906.] Motions of respondents for divided argument granted. Motions of respondents for additional time for oral argument or designation of counsel to present oral argument denied. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that James R. Kingsley, Esquire, of Circleville, Ohio, be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Isaac in this case.