green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. State
See Bryant v. State, 49 Md.App. 272 , 431 A.2d 714 , cert. denied 291 Md. 782 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982), and Wallace v. State, 100 Md.App. 235 , 640 A.2d 749 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Edelman, 873 F.2d 791, 795 (5th Cir.1989) (citing United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 389 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wallace
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 390-91 (5th Cir.1981) (any prejudice caused by witness’s unsolicited reference to polygraph cured by instruction to disregard), vacated in part on other grounds, 650 F.2d 651 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joe Allen Bounds
(2×)
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 391 (5th Cir. June 1981), vacated in part on other grounds, 650 F.2d 651 (5th Cir. July 1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982) (any prejudice caused by reference to polygraph cured by instruction).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lee Alexander
See United States v. McBee, 659 F.2d 1302, 1306 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (police were justified in conducting a warrantless search of a car that they had already impounded because the mobility problem, though slight, continued to exist), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). 5 Based on the evidence noted above, the district court held that the government had satisfied the exigency prong of the automobile exception, but the court then stated an alternative holding.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Manotas-Mejia, Justo Estrada-Tello, Julian Enriquez-Castro, and Samuel Ramirez-Rios
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 405 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manzella
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 383 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manzella
See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 383 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). 13 Because he was only an occasional customer, however, Canale was not personally involved in the crimes of the Provenzano organization perpetrated at the behest of other customers.
cited
Cited "see"
Lavicky v. Burnett
See United States v. Tolerton, 669 F.2d 652, 654 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 473 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Lavicky v. Burnett
See United States v. Tolerton, 669 F.2d 652, 654 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 473 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fernando Cisneros-Mireles and Jorge Luis Cisneros-Mireles
See United States v. McBee, 659 F.2d 1302 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982); Gaultney, 581 F.2d at 1142 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dowl
See also United States v. McBee, 659 F.2d 1302, 1305 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982); United States v. Whitfield, 629 F.2d 136, 141-42 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abbell
While the number of defendants should not be the determinative factor in whether a court grants or denies a motion to sever, severance becomes necessary if the jury will not be able to "individualize each defendant in his relation to the mass." United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459, 1476 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1101 , 106 S.Ct. 880 , 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); see also, United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 385 (5th Cir.1981) (assessing "`whether ... it is within the capacity of the jur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watters v. State
Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444-45 , 86 S.Ct. at 1612-13 ; see also Bryant v. State, 49 Md.App. 272, 277 , 431 A.2d 714 , cert. denied, 291 Md. 772 , 782 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roche v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982) (word “conduct”, as used in RICO, simply means the performance of activities necessary or helpful to the operation of the enterprise); Joseph v. Algemene Bank Nederland, N.V., 592 F.Supp. 141 (W.D.Pa.1984) (it is only when the predicate acts are unrelated to the enterprise or the actor’s association with it that the nexus element is missing).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chagra
Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal § 515 et seq. (2 ed. 1982); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 382 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). ' Conspiracy requires that the actors intend to commit some substantive criminal offense.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
See also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 402-03 (5th Cir.1981) (arson and mail fraud arising from same burning), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2007 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 , 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed.2d 465 (1982); United States v. Colacurio, 659 F.2d 684 , 688 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981) (multiple briberies), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 1635 , 71 L.Ed.2d 869 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Radovsky v. State
See also the extensive discussion of Edwards and the other pertinent Supreme Court cases by Chief Judge Gilbert for the Court of Special Appeals in Bryant v. State, 49 Md.App. 272 , 431 A.2d 714 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Glen Shaw
See also United States v. McBee, 659 F.2d 1302, 1305 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). 6 Clearly, the rationale of Chambers and its progeny is not that an automobile maintains its mobility when parked at the police station, but rather that, given the scope of the initial intrusion caused by seizure of an automobile, there is no constitutional difference between the proper search on the highway and the later search at the station. 7 In the words of the Supreme Court, “for constitutional purposes, we see no difference between on the one hand s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.
All that is necessary is that the person “be aware of the essential nature and scope of the enterprise and intend to participate.” United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258, 1269 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 831 , 100 S.Ct. 60 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979); see also United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 404 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2020 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flowers
v.
Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
v.
Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
No. 81-6455.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1982.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.