green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
E.J. Wilson, Dearest Davis, and Cassandra Linder, Plaintiffs v. Roland Attaway
But see McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1388 (11th Cir.1981) (“personal involvement,” custom, or policy required), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. Pringle
See McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1388 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Collins v. Walden
See McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385 (11th Cir.1981), reh’g denied, 668 F.2d 536 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kleckner v. Glover Trucking Corp.
See McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1387 (11th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); Graham v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 342 F.2d 914 (D.C.Cir.1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 904 , 85 S.Ct. 1446 , 14 L.Ed.2d 286 (1965); Urban v. Talleyville Fire Company, 98 F.R.D. 634 (D.Del.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) Draw Poker-Type MacHines & Six (6) Slot MacHines
Accord McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385 (11th Cir.1981) (denial of appellants' motion for additional time to respond to motion for summary judgment was not an abuse of discretion), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); Farina v. Mission Investment Trust, 615 F.2d 1068, 1076 (5th Cir.1980) ("absent an affirmative showing by the non-moving party of excusable neglect, according to Rule 6(b) a court does not abuse its discretion when it refuses to accept out-of-time affidavits” opposing a motion for summary judgment); Urban v. Talleyville Fire Co., 98 …
cited
Cited "see"
Colon v. Lomelo
See McLaughlin v. LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385 , 1388 (11th Cir. 1981), reh. denied, 668 F.2d 536 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louise Parrott, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Parrott, Deceased v. Max v. Wilson, Etc.
Hamrick v. Lewis, 515 F.Supp. 983, 987 (N.D.Ill.1981); see McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1388 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); Ford v. Byrd, 544 F.2d 194, 195 (5th Cir.1976); Sims v. Adams, 537 F.2d 829, 831-32 (5th Cir.1976); Berry v. McLemore, 670 F.2d 30, 32-34 (5th Cir.1982); Owens v. Haas, 601 F.2d 1242, 1246-47 (2d Cir.1979); Hampton v. Holmesburg Prison Officials, 546 F.2d 1077, 1082 (3d Cir.1976); cf. Vasquez v. Snow, 616 F.2d 217, 220 (5th Cir.1980); Whitehurst v. Wright, 592 F.2d 834, 838 (5th Cir.1979). 26 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schoenman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Simply put, the “excuse of being a solo practitioner is as good as no excuse at all.” Parks v. Ingersoll-Rand, 380 Fed.Appx. 190, 195 (3d Cir.2010); see also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1387 (11th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldwin Technology Corp. v. Dahlgren International, Inc. (In Re Dahlgren International, Inc.)
See United States v. O’Neil, 709 F.2d 361 , 373-74 (1983) (discussing excusable neglect under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60[b]); see also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1387 (11th Cir.1981) (discussing other acts of neglect that fall short of Rule 6[b][2]’s demands), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); 4A Wright & Miller § 1165 (expounding on the same Rule 6[b][2] principles). • In this case, Baldwin’s motion came after the three year period had expired, and there is neither good cause shown nor excusable neglect.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & Associates
See Farina v. Mission Investment Trust, 615 F.2d 1068, 1076 (5th Cir.1980) (court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to grant additional time to file affidavits where there was no showing of excusable neglect); see also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1387 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982) ("a busy practice does not establish 'excusable neglect’ ”); 4A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1165, at 480-81 (1987) (rule 6(b) motion will probably not be granted on the ground of “simple inadvertence”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United States
RUSCC 6(b) (press of other matters or acts within a party’s control does not constitute excusable neglect); see also McLauglin v. City of Lagrange, 662 F.2d 1385 , 1387 (11th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (fact that party was a solo practitioner and engaged with other cases does not constitute excusable neglect for party’s delay), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); Mawhinney v. Heckler, 600 F.Supp. 783, 784 (D.Me.1985) (delay caused by backlog of cases does not constitute excusable neglect).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greg Zatler v. Louie L. Wainwright
(2×)
See also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1388 (11th Cir.1981) (footnote omitted), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louise White v. Dorothy Arn
See, e.g., Carter v. Jago, 637 F.2d 449, 455 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); Hooper v. Perini, 641 F.2d 445, 446 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 817 , 102 S.Ct. 95 , 70 L.Ed.2d 86 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Anderson
See Also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1388 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bush v. Ware
See also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1388 (11th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
General Television Arts, Inc. v. Southern Railway Company
Hence this Court and its predecessor continued to hold after the enactment of Rule 4(a)(2) in 1979 that a final judgment does not “retroactively validate the premature notice of appeal.” United States v. Taylor, 632 F.2d 530, 531 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980); see also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1387 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cynthia Wellington, Guardian of the Estate of Robert D. Gravelle v. Brian L. Daniels, Darrel W. Stephens and City of Newport News, Virginia
See also McLaughlin v. City of LaGrange, 662 F.2d 1385, 1388 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 979 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carter
v.
Jago
v.
Jago
No. 81-6420.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.