green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Maluf v. Bergelectric Corp
See Fisher v. City of Tucson, 663 F.2d 861 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 103 S. Ct. 178 (1982). 22 Plaintiff does not cite to which section of the Rehabilitation Act he wishes to bring a claim 23 under, but reading his complaint liberally, he apparently seeks to state a private right of action under 24 Section 503.
cited
Cited "see"
Middlebrook Ex Rel. Middlebrook v. School District of the County of Knox
See Davis v. Board of Education of North Little Rock, Arkansas, School District, 674 F.2d 684, 688 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Treasure Salvors, Inc. v. Tilley
See South Florida Beverage Corp. v. Figueredo, 409 So.2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982); Excelsior; Paddock.
discussed
Cited "see"
Caven v. American Federal Savings And Loan Association Of Colorado
See South Florida Beverage Corp. v. Figueredo, 409 So.2d 490, 496 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1981) ("It may be presumed, however, than an amendment to an agreement is designed to serve some useful function, and its existence is strong evidence, therefore, that the contract was changed from what the parties believed and intended was provided before."), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Caven v. American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Colorado
See South Florida Beverage Corp. v. Figueredo, 409 So.2d 490, 496 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1981) (“It may be presumed, however, than an amendment to an agreement is designed to serve some useful function, and its existence is strong evidence, therefore, that the contract was changed from what the parties believed and intended was provided before.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Smith
See Fisher v. City of Tucson, 663 F.2d 861 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982), Painter v. Horne Brothers, Inc., 710 F.2d 143 (4th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Home Depot, Inc., and Gaylord's National Corporation v. William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, Defendant
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Harry’s Hardware, Inc. v. Parsons, 410 So.2d 735, 736 (La.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Branch NAACP v. Los Angeles Unified School District
See, e.g., Davis v. Board of Education of North Little Rock, 674 F.2d 684, 689 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982) (a victim of past de jure school segregation alleges a justiciable case or controversy as long as a unitary system of education has not yet been achieved); Ybarra v. City of San Jose, 503 F.2d 1041, 1044 (9th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School District
See, e.g., Davis v. Board of Education of North Little Rock, 674 F.2d 684, 689 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982) (a victim of past de jure school segregation alleges a justiciable case or controversy as long as a unitary system of education has not yet been achieved); Ybarra v. City of San Jose, 503 F.2d 1041, 1044 (9th Cir.1974). 6 The state defendants argue, however, that even if they engaged in de jure segregation in the past, they are now without power to remedy any segregation still existing in the Los Angeles schools, because the responsibilit…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Local 66, Boston Teachers Union, AFT, AFL-CIO
v.
Boston School Committee
v.
Boston School Committee
No. 81-2306.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Motions of American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, A. Philip Randolph Institute, and University Centers for Rational Alternatives, Inc., for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.