green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
13.8 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1984 ·
…reasonableness of the attorney's fee may be challenged, lest it encroach unduly on the net proceeds
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
D'ANTORIO v. State
such credit cards are becoming a necessary hazard of life in our plastic society, although significant financial loss can result from the theft and use of the cards by an unauthorized person.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jorge Ochoa v. Employers National Insurance Co., Intervenors-Appellees, Waterman Steamship Corp.
(8×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
reasonableness of the attorney's fee may be challenged, lest it encroach unduly on the net proceeds
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Babbitt Ford, Inc. v. Navajo Indian Tribe
(5×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Id. at 366 (footnote omitted); see also Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes v. Namen, 665 F.2d 951, 962-64 (9th Cir.) (water pollution regulations “falls squarely within the exception recognized in Montana’’), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 314 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Babbitt Ford, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. The Navajo Indian Tribe, Through Its Chairman, Peterson Zah, and Tom and Lorraine Sellers, Defendants-Cross-Appellants. Gurley Motor Company, a New Mexico Corporation v. Peterson Zah, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Navajo Tribal Council
(5×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
We reasoned that: 54 [t]o hold that Indian tribes cannot exercise civil jurisdiction over non-Indians would, when combined with Oliphant, eliminate altogether any tribal jurisdiction over persons not members of the tribe, and thus, reduce to a nullity the Supreme Court's repeated assertions that Indian tribes retain attributes of sovereignty over their territory, not just their members. 55 Id. at 366 (footnote omitted); see also Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes v. Namen, 665 F.2d 951, 962-64 (9th Cir.) (water pollution regulations "falls squarely within the exception recognized in Montana…
examined
Cited "see"
Goebel v. Colorado Department of Institutions
(4×)
See Johnson v. Uncle Ben's, Inc., 628 F.2d 419 , 423 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied *795 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
Juan Segundo v. City of Rancho Mirage, a Municipal Corporation, Jean Chormicle Kapp v. City of Cathedral City, California
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Cardin v. De La Cruz, 671 F.2d 363 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982); Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 , 101 S.Ct. 1245 , 67 L.Ed.2d 493 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Craig v. Alabama State University
(2×)
See Johnson v. Uncle Ben's, Inc., 657 F.2d 750 , 752 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Craig v. Alabama State University
(2×)
See Johnson v. Uncle Ben’s, Inc., 657 F.2d 750 , 752 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mister v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
(2×)
See Johnson v. Uncle Ben’s Inc., 657 F.2d 750 , 752-53 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yakima Indian Nation v. Whiteside
(2×)
See Cardin v. De La Cruz, 671 F.2d 363 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982); Sechrist v. Quinault Indian Nation, I.L.R. 3064 (W.D.Wash.1982). 8 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Yakima Indian Nation v. Whiteside
(2×)
See Cardin v. De La Cruz, 671 F.2d 363 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982); Sechrist v. Quinault Indian Nation, I.L.R. 3064 (W.D.Wash.1982). 6 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ernest L. Griffin, Cross-Appellees v. Carl Carlin, Postmaster General, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See Johnson v. Uncle Ben’s, Inc., 628 F.2d 419 , 426-27 (5th Cir.1980), vacated, 451 U.S. 902 , 101 S.Ct. 1967 , 68 L.Ed.2d 290 (1981), modified and aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 657 F.2d 750 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, and Spokane Tribe of Indians, Plaintiff-In-Intervention-Appellant v. Barbara J. Anderson, James M. Anderson
(2×)
See Cardin v. De La Cruz, 671 F.2d 363 (9th Cir.) (building, health and safety regulations applied to nonmember business located on fee lands within the reservation), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982); Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. Namen, 665 F.2d 951 (9th Cir.) (regulation of riparian rights of non-Indians), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 977 , 103 S.Ct. 314 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982).
examined
Cited "see"
National Farmers Union Insurance Companies, a Utah Corporation, and Lodge Grass School District No. 27 v. Crow Tribe of Indians
(4×)
Accord, Cardin v. De La Cruz, 671 F.2d 363, 365 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982). 14 It is clear too that a plaintiff may state a federal cause of action for improper taxation by an Indian tribe.
discussed
Cited "see"
31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1578, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,571 Frank L. Eastland, Individually v. Tennessee Valley Authority
(2×)
See Johnson v. Uncle Ben’s, Inc., 628 F.2d 419 , 426-27 (5th Cir.1980), vacated, 451 U.S. 902 , 101 S.Ct. 1967 , 68 L.Ed.2d 290 (1981), modified and aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 657 F.2d 750 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose Menzies
See Chesebrough-Pond’s, Inc. v. Faberge, Inc., 666 F.2d 393 , 396 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 294 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982); Blackman v. Hadron, Inc., 450 F.2d 781, 782 (2d Cir.1971) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marie Lucie Jean, Lucien Louis, Cross-Appellants, State of Florida, Intervenor-Appellant v. Alan C. Nelson, Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See Johnson v. Uncle Ben’s, Inc., 628 F.2d 419 , 424 (5th Cir.1980) (rebuttal includes existence of “legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for defendant’s action, or evidence of “total unacceptability of plaintiff’s statistical evidence”), vacated and remanded, 451 U.S. 902 , 101 S.Ct. 1967 , 68 L.Ed.2d 290 (1981) , modified in part, rev’d in part, 657 F.2d 750 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
L.A. Gold Clothing Co. v. L.A. Gear, Inc.
See, e.g., Chesebrough-Pond’s, Inc. v. Faberge, Inc., 666 F.2d 393 , 396 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 294 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982), citing, Societe de Conditionnement v. Hunter Engineering Co., 655 F.2d 938, 944 (9th Cir.1981).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of Washington
(4×)
Moore, 708 F.2d at 482 (involving impact showing with respect to promotion policy); see also Johnson v. Uncle Ben's, Inc., 657 F.2d 750 , 753 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 967 , 103 S.Ct. 293 , 74 L.Ed.2d 277 (1982). 69 Gunther, a disparate treatment case, offers no help in evaluating the nursing faculty's impact claim.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kinsel
v.
Wolfe
v.
Wolfe
No. 81-2195.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (4) · Alaska Supreme Court (1)
Dist. Ct. Hot Springs County, Wyo. Certiorari denied.