green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Donald Henry
(2×)
See United States v. Hayes, 595 F.2d at 260-61 ; accord United States v. Lawson, 682 F.2d 480, 482-83 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 348 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
In recognition that a broad application of Timken and Perma Life could subvert legitimate procompetitive business associations, this circuit has found the threshold requirement of concerted activity missing among “multiple corporations operated as a single entity” when “corporate policies are set by one individual or by a parent corporation.” General Business Systems v. North American Philips Corp., 699 F.2d 965, 980 (9th Cir.1983); see Thomsen v. Western Electric Co., 680 F.2d 1263, 1266 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 348 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982); Las Vegas Sun, Inc…
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Highwood Service, Inc., Empire Sports, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., New York Jets Football Club, Inc., and Chargers Football Company, Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., and Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants, and Los Angeles Rams Football Co., Defendant/cross-Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc., Intervenor/defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Oakland Raiders, Ltd., Cross-Claimant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
In recognition that a broad application of Timken and Perma Life could subvert legitimate procompetitive business associations, this circuit has found the threshold requirement of concerted activity missing among "multiple corporations operated as a single entity" when "corporate policies are set by one individual or by a parent corporation." General Business Systems v. North American Philips Corp., 699 F.2d 965, 980 (9th Cir.1983); see Thomsen v. Western Electric Co., 680 F.2d 1263, 1266 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 348 , 74 L.Ed.2d 387 (1982); Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Sum…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomsen
v.
Western Electric Co., Inc.
v.
Western Electric Co., Inc.
No. 82-627.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1982.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.