green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Prasoprat v. Benov
See Zuniga v. United Can Co., 812 F.2d 443, 450 (9th Cir.1987) (“District courts are ... bound by the law of their own circuit, and ‘are not to resolve splits between circuits no matter how egregiously in error they may feel their own circuit to be.’ ”) (quoting Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowen v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1214 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. *897 828, 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); Report of the Third Circuit Task Force, Court Awarded Attorney Fees, 108 F.R.D. 237 , 255 (1985). i. Reasonable Hours Plaintiffs’ attorney Beck has requested compensation for 951.6 hours, and has submitted itemized documentation of the time he has devoted to this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hasbrouck v. Texaco
See Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U.S. 275, 283-84 , 66 S.Ct. 1105, 1110 , 90 L.Ed. 1230 (1946). 49 AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. 1 Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) 2 The lodestar is the amount derived from the reasonable hours expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Bowen
See Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ibarra v. Texas Employment Commission
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1208 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); see also Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir.1984) (upholding the approval of consent decree in prison litigation over the objection of the state attorney general who had no interest prejudicially affected by the decree).
discussed
Cited "see"
38 Fair empl.prac.cas. 820, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,561 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Delores Agee, Madeline Aiello, Edna Braten, Laura Bury, Neva Buttell, Helen Claver, Charolette Dickerson, Leslie Drummer, Gladys Dwyer, Mary Ebell, Margaret Evans, Pearl Fice, Nora Flynn, Rose Genusa, Annie Gibbons, Freda Goldsmith, Agnes Hall, Rose Harvey, Virgil Hayes, Doris Hornung, Harriet Hutton, Clara Jenkens, Mary Kaufmann, Mary Lafferty, Clara Maricle, Eleanor Marinich, Amelia Monroe, Emma Lou Moore, Ruth Osborn, Ann Pitcher, Julia Ross, Lavon Schuster, Margaret Thompson, Millie Wageman, Josephine Walker, Ann Williams, Grace Wort, Jessie Wright, and Geneva Wytcherly, Intervenors-Appellants v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc., and Distillery Workers of America, Local 55
Underlying these standards is the general policy favoring voluntary settlements of class action disputes, Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington Heights, 616 F.2d at 1013 ; accord Bennett v. Behring Corp., 737 F.2d 982, 986 (11th Cir.1984); Adams Extract Co. v. Pleasure Hours, Inc. (In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation), 643 F.2d 195, 207 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 998 , 102 S.Ct. 2283 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1294 (1982), a policy even more forcefully applicable in Title VII cases because of Congress' express preference for settlement in such cases, Freedman…
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc.
Underlying these standards is the general policy favoring voluntary settlements of class ac tion disputes, Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington Heights, 616 F.2d at 1013 ; accord Bennett v. Behring Corp., 737 F.2d 982, 986 (11th Cir.1984); Adams Extract Co. v. Pleasure Hours, Inc. (In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation), 643 F.2d 195, 207 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 998 , 102 S.Ct. 2283 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1294 (1982), a policy even more forcefully applicable in Title VII cases because of Congress’ express preference for settlement in such cases, Freed…
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1210-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); Kincade v. General Tire & Rubber Co., 635 F.2d 501, 508 (5th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1210-11 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); Kincade v. General Tire & Rubber Co., 635 F.2d 501, 508 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Fleet/Norstar Securities Litigation
Id.; see also Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1209 (5th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982). (a) The Class Action Claims In Count I and Count II the class plaintiffs made claims under § 10(b) of the Exchange Act 2 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. 3 Common law claims for negligent mis *106 representation were also asserted in Count III.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Lesslie
People v. Oates, 698 P.2d 811 (Colo.1985); cf. O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 , 107 S.Ct. 1492 , 94 L.Ed.2d 714 (1987) (reasonable expectation must be addressed on a case-by-case basis weighing the general practical societal expectations of privacy in the workplace against the practical realities of the particular workplace); compare People v. Hillman, 834 P.2d 1271 (Colo.1992) (no invasion of privacy in observation of that which is plainly visible to the public) and United States v. Rose, 669 F.2d 23 (1st Cir.1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) (no reas…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gass
See also, U.S. v. Rose, 669 F.2d 23, 26-27 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. Mejia
See also Estate of Johnson, 125 Cal.App.3d 1044, 1048 , 178 Cal.Rptr. 823, 826 (Cal.Ct.App.1981), cert. denied by Cory v. Campbell, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) (recognizing that assimilation policy existed in United States in the 1900s).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.
See also Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1210-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) (consent decree in class action upheld despite objections of a named party and class representative).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holst v. Bowen
See, e.g., Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph
v.
Bond
v.
Bond
No. 81-2130.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.