McCloud v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 459 U.S. 1106 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
McCloud v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 459 U.S. 1106 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
204 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 43 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Elliott v. Elliott (moctapp, 1996-03-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Elliott v. Elliott
Mo. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Jenks v. Jenks, 385 S.W.2d 370, 380 (Mo.App.1964); see Toomey v. Toomey, 636 S.W.2d 313, 315 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" James v. Texas Department of Human Services
N.D. Tex. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, Div. of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211, 1215 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that a right-to-sue letter is not a jurisdictional requirement but rather a condition precedent, which can be fulfilled after filing suit), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
cited Cited "see" May v. May
Mo. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Toomey v. Toomey, 636 S.W.2d 313, 315-16 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Dennis Skinner, and Cross-Appellant v. Total Petroleum, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, a Div. of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983); DeMatteis v. Eastman Kodak Co., 511 F.2d 306 (2d Cir.1975); Price v. Federal Express Corp., 660 F.Supp. 1388 (D.Colo.1987); Perry v. Manocherian, 675 F.Supp. 1417 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Ragheb v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich., 467 F.Supp. 94 (E.D.Mich.1979); Liotta v. National Forge Co., 473 F.Supp. 1139 (W.D.Pa.1979), aff’d in part, 629 F.2d 903 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 970 , 101 S.Ct. 2045 , 68 L.Ed.2d 348 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" William B. Larkin Louise Seals, as Personal Representative of Spurgeon Seals, Deceased Lillie Lofton, as Personal Representative of Edward Lofton, Deceased Jesse B. Terry, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant- Louis Swint and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinists Louis Swint, and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama, United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinists
11th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1219 (11th Cir.1982) ("the receipt of a right-to-sue letter subsequent to the commencement of a Title VII action, but while the action remains pending, satisfies the precondition that a plaintiff obtain statutory notice of the right to sue before filing a civil action"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc.
11th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1219 (11th Cir.1982) (“the receipt of a right-to-sue letter subsequent to the commencement of a Title VII action, but while the action remains pending, satisfies the precondition that a plaintiff obtain statutory notice of the right to sue before filing a civil action"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Thornton v. Chrysler Corp.
D. Maryland · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1215-19 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983) ; Gordon v. National Youth Work Alliance, 675 F.2d 356, 359-60 (D.C.Cir. 1982); Thomas v. KATV Channel 7, 692 F.2d 548 , 549 n. 2 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 1431 , 75 L.Ed.2d 790 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Adams v. Burlington Northern Railroad
D. Kan. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Pinhard, v. Pullman-Standard, Div. of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983) (right-to-sue letter as precondition to filing Title VII suit satisfied by receipt of letter while action still pending); Hladki v. Jeffrey’s Consol., Ltd., 652 F.Supp. 388 (E.D.N.Y.1987) (dismissing action under Rule 9(c) for failure to plead or aver compliance with a condition precedent when plaintiff brought Title VII action before obtaining right-to-sue letter from EEOC).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Graf v. Bacon
Mo. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is no valid objection to the child support provisions of a dissolution decree that it may “require payments by the supporting parent to third parties such as schools, camps, or health care providers.” Niederkorn v. Niederkorn, 616 S.W.2d 529, 539 (Mo.App.1981); see also Toomey v. Toomey, 636 S.W.2d 313, 315 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 955 (1983); Biggs v. Biggs, 397 S.W.2d 337, 342-43 (Mo.App.1965).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. National RR Passenger Corp.
D.D.C. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211 , 1229 n. 15 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co. (2×)
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
They are, however, nothing more than procedural prerequisites to the court’s determination of the substantive issues.” Id. at 524 ; see also Nilsen v. City of Moss Point, 674 F.2d 379, 383-84 (5th Cir.1982). 18 Similarly, in Pin kard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983), we applied Zipes to hold under section 706(f)(1), that “the receipt of a right-to-sue letter is not a jurisdictional prerequisite, but rather is a condition precedent subject to equitable modification.” Id. at 1216; accord Go…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ying Shen v. Oklahoma State Department of Health
W.D. Okla. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, 678 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983); Jackson v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 678 F.2d 992 (11th Cir.1982). *190 Accordingly, the Plaintiffs action is dismissed in its entirety.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lucius T. SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. Hugh HARDISON, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pinkard v. Pullman-Standard, a Division of Pullman, Inc., 678 F.2d 1211, 1216-17 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hicks (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: compare · confidence low
State v. Rachal, 428 So.2d 805 (La.1983); State v. Jones, supra; State v. Grey, 408 So.2d 1239 (La.1982); State v. Bing, 410 So.2d 227 (La.1982); compare, State v. Fergus, 418 So.2d 594 (La.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1106 , 103 S.Ct. 730 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harry M. Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
D.C. Cir. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Pinkard v. Pullman Standard, 678 F.2d 1211, 1219 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, —U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 954 (1983); accord Fouche v. Jekyll Island-State Park Auth., 713 F.2d 1518, 1525 (11th Cir.1982); Perdue v. Roy Stone Transfer Corp., 690 F.2d 1091, 1093 (4th Cir.1982); Watson v. Fuller Brush Co., 570 F.Supp. 1299 (W.D.Mich.1983); Black v. Brown Univ., 555 F.Supp. 880, 884 (D.R.I.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCloud
v.
National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK)
No. 82-750.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1983.
459 U.S. 1106
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.