green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Louis v. BD. OF ED. OF CITY OF NEW YORK
See Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination, 671 F.2d 30 , 36, (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter Johnson v. Richard L. Dugger, Director Division of Corrections, Jim Smith, Attorney General
See Demps v. Wainwright, 666 F.2d 224, 227 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 844 , 103 S.Ct. 98 , 74 L.Ed.2d 89 (1982); Alvarez v. Wainwright, 607 F.2d 683, 685 (5th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard James Smith, Sr. v. Lanson Newsome, Warden and Michael Bowers
See Demps v. Wainwright, 666 F.2d 224, 227 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 844 , 103 S.Ct. 98 , 74 L.Ed.2d 89 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Genaro Rafael Hernandez-Cano
See U.S. v. Wilson, 671 F.2d 1291, 1293-94 (11th Cir.) (evidence of threat on president-elect admissible under inevitable discovery exception because “[e]ven if the letter had not been intercepted and opened by [prison officials], there is a reasonable probability that someone on the staff of the President-elect would have opened it on its arrival in Washington, D.C.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 844 , 103 S.Ct. 98 , 74 L.Ed.2d 89 (1982); see also Wicker v. McCotter, 783 F.2d 487, 497 (5th Cir.) (evidence admissible because if suspect had not directed police to the location of the murder victi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wellington Mitchell v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce
See Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination, 671 F.2d 30 , 36 (1st Cir.) (“In determining the propriety of a Rule 41(b) dismissal of a Title VII claim, the question is whether plaintiff had notice of defendant’s stated reasons for dismissal and an opportunity to demonstrate their pretextual character.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982); Flowers v. Crouch-Walker Corp., 552 F.2d 1277, 1282 (7th Cir.1977); see also Sime v. Trustees of California State University & Colleges, 526 F.2d 1112, 1114-15 (9th Cir.1975) (emphasizing plaintiff’s unused opportuni…
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary Garcia v. Richard Wilson and Martin Vigil
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination, 671 F.2d 30 , 33 & n. 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982); Hussey v. Sullivan, 651 F.2d 74, 75-76 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frances Childs v. Local 18, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
See Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination of Massachusetts, 671 F.2d 30, 36-38 (1st Cir. 1982) (inability to perform job duties is a legitimate reason for dismissal), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shark v. Thompson
See, e.g., Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination, 671 F.2d 30 , 35 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982), disapproved on other grounds in Burnett v. Grattan, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2924 , 82 L.Ed.2d 36 (1984); United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers v. Lee National Corp., 513 F.2d 899, 900 (2d Cir.1975); American Plan Corp. v. State Loan & Finance Corp., 365 F.2d 635, 638 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1011 , 87 S.Ct. 719 , 17 L.Ed.2d 548 (1967); B’s Company, Inc. v. B.P.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH & DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See, e.g., Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination, etc., 671 F.2d 30 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982); Gaballah v. Johnson, 629 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir.1980); Sime v. Trustees of the California State University and Colleges, 526 F.2d 1112 (9th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1984
Aikens thus makes clear that the "shifting burdens" approach of McDonnell Douglas is not a prescription for refereeing carefully timed volleys of proof and counterproof, but rather " 'merely a sensible, orderly way to evaluate the evidence in light of common experience as it bears on the critical question of discrimination.' " Id., quoting Furnco, 438 U.S. at 577 , 98 S.Ct. at 2949 ; see also Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination, 671 F.2d 30 , 35-36 (1st Cir.) (allocation of burdens goes to analysis rather than timing of proof), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Binyon
(2×)
See also Donnell v. General Motors Corporation, 576 F.2d 1292 , 1296 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 844 , 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74 L.Ed.2d 88 (1982); Fed.Reg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Craik v. Minnesota State University Board
Aikens thus makes clear that the “shifting burdens” approach of McDonnell Douglas is not a prescription for refereeing carefully timed volleys of proof and counterproof, but rather “ ‘merely a sensible, orderly way to evaluate the evidence in light of common experience as it bears on the critical question of discrimination.’ ” Id., quoting Furnco, 438 U.S. at 577 , 98 S.Ct. at 2949 ; see also Holden v. Commission Against Discrimination, 671 F.2d 30 , 35-36 (1st Cir.) (allocation of burdens goes to analysis rather than timing of proof), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 843 , 103 S.Ct. 97 , 74…
Battle
v.
Sutton
v.
Sutton
No. 81-6735.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.