green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.9 score
“because the classification and referral practices complained of effectively turn on discretionary decisions, they do not fall within the category of facially neutral procedures to which the disparate impact model is traditionally applied,”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gregory Scott Hermanski A/K/A Steve Lambert
if a defendant has appeared before a judicial officer in connec 1242 tion with the charge prior to the filing of the indictment, then the speedy trial clock commences on the date the indictment was filed
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Erlinda REGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
because the classification and referral practices complained of effectively turn on discretionary decisions, they do not fall within the category of facially neutral procedures to which the disparate impact model is traditionally applied,
discussed
Cited "see"
Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.
(2×)
See Pegues v. Mississippi State Employment Serv., 699 F.2d 760 , 763 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reggie Eugene May
See United States v. Terry, 702 F.2d 299, 319 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 931 , 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 , and cert. denied, 464 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 680 (1983); see also United States v. Woods, 560 F.2d 660, 665 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 906 , 98 S.Ct. 1452 , 55 L.Ed.2d 497 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Charles Richard Mentz
(2×)
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1336, 1338-39 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983). 24 62 With these principles in mind, we turn to the record in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joy Rogers Thomas v. Metroflight, Inc., D/B/A Metro Airlines, Inc.
But see Bunch v. Bullard, 795 F.2d 384, 395 (5th Cir.1986) (disparate impact established in small sample of twenty-eight, where observed disparity in exam pass rates was great enough); Marsh v. Eaton Corp. 639 F.2d 328, 329 (6th Cir.1981) (error for trial court to conclude that disparate impact could not be established, after evaluation of small pool of forty-four new hires revealed eight men placed in slightly better positions than women; noting danger of simply exempting small employers from Title VII); accord Pegues v. Mississippi State Employment Service, 699 F.2d 760, 769 (5th Cir.), cert…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul M. Mooney, United States of America v. Karen F. Mooney
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321 , 1326 n. 1 (11th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); see generally Waltz, Inadequacy of Trial Defense Representation as a Ground for Post-Conviction Relief in Criminal Cases, 59 Nw.U.
discussed
Cited "see"
Armstrong v. People
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); United States v. Agosto, 675 F.2d 965 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 834 , 103 S.Ct. 77 , 74 L.Ed.2d 74 (1982); Abraham v. United States, 549 F.2d 236 (2d Cir.1977) (per curiam); United States v. Garcia, 517 F.2d 272 (5th Cir.1975); United States v. Truglio, 493 F.2d 574 (4th Cir.1974); Campbell v. United States, 352 F.2d 359 (D.C.Cir.1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eduardo Orozco-Prada, Humberto Orozco-Prada, Paul Forand and Mahlon Clark
See United States v. Terry, 702 F.2d 299, 320 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 and — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 680 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Harrison Barham, A/K/A Robert Meyers
(2×)
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1326 (11th Cir.1983) (“mere fact of joint representation will certainly not show an actual conflict.”) (citations omitted) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sparks v. State
See also United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir.1983) cert. denied 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); Henderson v. United States, 237 F.2d 169 (5th Cir.1956). 22 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. Chippas
See also United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1325 (11th Cir.) (applying Garcia to Rule 44(c)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Jeffery Jackson, Cross-Appellee
See e.g., United States v. Terry, 702 F.2d 299, 314 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 931 , 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 and 464 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 680 (1983) (held defendant's refusal to furnish palm print was admissible as consciousness of guilt); United States v. Knight, 607 F.2d 1172, 1177 (5th Cir.1979) (comment on the defendant's failure to furnish handwriting exemplars is permissible); United States v. Blankney, 581 F.2d 1389, 1390 (10th Cir.1978) (court held testimony regarding refusal to provide handwriting exemplars was not prejudicial error); United States v. M…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Duncan
See also United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1322 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hartley
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Terry, 702 F. 2d 299 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 931 , 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 304 , and 464 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed. 2d 680 (1983) (statement given as the result of a non-coercive reinterrogation on same subject after forty minutes and fresh Miranda warnings held admissible); United States v. Smith, 608 F. 2d 1011 (4th Cir.1979) (statement made after a brief cessation of questioning and in the absence *267 of formal fresh Miranda warnings admissible as non-coercively obtained).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael Yamanis
In United States v. Wooten, 688 F.2d 941 (4th Cir.1982), the court stated, "What section 3161(c)(2) does is simply to guarantee to the criminal defendant the right to a delay of at least thirty days between arraignment and trial in any circumstances." Id. at 951 (emphasis added); see also United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1333-34 (11th Cir.) (quoting Wooten with approval), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 , — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shope, of the Estate of Shope
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 83-108.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1) · Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.