green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnes
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 507 (1st Cir.1984) (“[I]t is not necessary for the court to articulate the basic facts when they are obvious and set forth in a motion for a continuance.”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose Rodriguez
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 502 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); see also United States v. Montoya, 827 F.2d 143, 151 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. Velasquez, 802 F.2d 104, 105 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 813 (3d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. Philpot
(2×)
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 504 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. McGrath, 613 F.2d 361, 366 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 2946 , 64 L.Ed.2d 827 (1980); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 815 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); United States v. Holyfield, 802 F.2d 846, 848 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987); United States v. Fogarty, 692 F.2d 542, 546 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felton
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Ross, 654 F.2d 612, 616 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1290 , 71 L.Ed.2d 470 (1982); United States v. Russo, 550 F.Supp. 1315, 1319 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd, 722 F.2d 736 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045 , 104 S.Ct. 716 , 79 L.Ed.2d 179 (1984). 40 In the case at hand, the question is whether the exclusion extends to any of the time that elapsed between the date this court originally issued its mandate and when we later …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felton
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Ross, 654 F.2d 612, 616 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1290 , 71 L.Ed.2d 470 (1982); United States v. Russo, 550 F.Supp. 1315, 1319 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd, 722 F.2d 736 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045 , 104 S.Ct. 716 , 79 L.Ed.2d 179 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stacey Lynn Merkt and John B. Elder
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 511-13 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. *955 —, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820, 824-26 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1497 , 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983); Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851, 859-61 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d in part and remanded on other grounds, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Payden
Rehnquist, Oct. 19,1971, quoted in A. Partridge, supra, at 134; accord United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 503 (1st Cir.1984) (noting congres *1429 sional intent “of avoiding waste of resources on unnecessary severances and separate trials.”), cert. denied, 105 S.Ct. 1355 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Jack Leroy Gallardo, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 503-04 (1st Cir.1984) (noting that “[t]he Guidelines, of -course, are not binding,” especially when they appear to conflict with congressional intent), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 815 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); see also Guidelines 16 (indicating that this circuit’s decision in United States v. Harris, 724 F.2d 1452 (9th Cir.1984), does not follow the Guidelines’s interpretation of section 3161(c)(2)).
cited
Cited "see"
Soler v. G & U, INC.
See Donovan v. Red Star Marine Serv., Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 776 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacqueline Allen, Clare Grady, Dean Hammer, Elizabeth McAlister Vern Rossman, Kathleen Rumpf, Karl Smith
Thus free exercise claims have had to yield before state interests in monogamy, see Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 161-67 , 8 Otto 145 , 161-67, 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878), in protecting children’s- health through blood transfusions, see Jehovah’s Witnesses v. King County Hospital Unit No. 1, 390 U.S. 598 , 88 S.Ct. 1260 , 20 L.Ed.2d 158 (1968) (per curiam), aff'g 278 F.Supp. 488 (W.D.Wash.1967), in assuring mandatory and continuous participation in the Social Security system, see United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. at 258-60 , 102 S.Ct. at 1055-57 , in obtaining court testimony, see Smilow v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bruce Derek Spring AKA Bruce Derek Walls
The First and Third Circuits have stated that open-ended continuances to serve the ends of justice are not prohibited, provided “they are reasonable in length.” United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 868 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 97 , 126 L.Ed.2d 64 (1993); see also United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 508 (1st Cir.1984) (observing that “it is inevitable that in some cases, like the present one, a court is forced to order an (h)(8) continuance without knowing exactly how long the reasons supporting the continuance will remain valid”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 100…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association of American Railroads v. Department of Transportation
See also Donovan v. Red Star Marine Serv., Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 778 (2d Cir.1984) (“ ‘exercise,’ as used in section 4(b)(1) of the Act, requires an actual, concrete assertion of regulatory authority as opposed to mere possession of authority”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1003 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985); Southern Pac.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association Of American Railroads v. Department Of Transportation
See also Donovan v. Red Star Marine Serv., Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 778 (2d Cir.1984) (" 'exercise,' as used in section 4(b)(1) of the Act, requires an actual, concrete assertion of regulatory authority as opposed to mere possession of authority"), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1003 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985); Southern Pac.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred J. Greene
Middleton, 690 F.2d at 825 ; United States v. Hudson, 431 F.2d 468 , 469 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1011 , 91 S.Ct. 575 , 577, 27 L.Ed.2d 624 (1971) (stating “the use of drugs as part of religious practice is not constitutionally privileged”); see also United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 513 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) (quoting Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851, 861 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d on other grounds, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969), and noting the narrow administrative exception of peyote from…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hill
See, e.g., United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 514 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 107-08 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Shea Peeples
Compare United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984) (appellants concede that waiver has effect), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) with Pringle, 751 F.2d at 433 (appellants do not concede effectiveness of waiver). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Pratico v. Portland Terminal Company
(2×)
See also Donovan v. Red Star Marine Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 778 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985); Ensign-Bickford Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm ’n, 717 F.2d 1419, 1421 (D.C.Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 1909 , 80 L.Ed.2d 458 (1984); Southern Pacific Transp.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
D'Antignac
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-587.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1985.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.