D'Antignac v. United States (1985)

See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 504 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. McGrath, 613 F.2d 361, 366 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 2946 , 64 L.Ed.2d 827 (1980); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 815 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); United States v. Holyfield, 802 F.2d 846, 848 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090 , 1…

See also Donovan v. Red Star Marine Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 778 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985); Ensign-Bickford Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm ’n, 717 F.2d 1419, 1421 (D.C.Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 937 , 104 S.Ct. 1909 , 80 L.Ed.2d 458 (1984); Southern Pacific Transp.

See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 507 (1st Cir.1984) (“[I]t is not necessary for the court to articulate the basic facts when they are obvious and set forth in a motion for a continuance.”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).

The First and Third Circuits have stated that open-ended continuances to serve the ends of justice are not prohibited, provided “they are reasonable in length.” United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 868 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 97 , 126 L.Ed.2d 64 (1993); see also United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 508 (1st Cir.1984) (observing that “it is inevitable that in some cases, like the present one, a court is forced to order an (h)(8) continuance without …

See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 502 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); see also United States v. Montoya, 827 F.2d 143, 151 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. Velasquez, 802 F.2d 104, 105 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 813 (3d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).

See also Donovan v. Red Star Marine Serv., Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 778 (2d Cir.1984) (“ ‘exercise,’ as used in section 4(b)(1) of the Act, requires an actual, concrete assertion of regulatory authority as opposed to mere possession of authority”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1003 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985); Southern Pac.

See also Donovan v. Red Star Marine Serv., Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 778 (2d Cir.1984) (" 'exercise,' as used in section 4(b)(1) of the Act, requires an actual, concrete assertion of regulatory authority as opposed to mere possession of authority"), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1003 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985); Southern Pac.

Middleton, 690 F.2d at 825 ; United States v. Hudson, 431 F.2d 468 , 469 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1011 , 91 S.Ct. 575 , 577, 27 L.Ed.2d 624 (1971) (stating “the use of drugs as part of religious practice is not constitutionally privileged”); see also United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 513 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) (quoting Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851, 861 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d on other ground…

Compare United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984) (appellants concede that waiver has effect), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) with Pringle, 751 F.2d at 433 (appellants do not concede effectiveness of waiver). 2 .

See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Ross, 654 F.2d 612, 616 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1290 , 71 L.Ed.2d 470 (1982); United States v. Russo, 550 F.Supp. 1315, 1319 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd, 722 F.2d 736 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045 , 104 S.Ct. 716 , 79 L.Ed.2d 179 (1984). 40 In the case at hand, the question is whether the exclu…

See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Ross, 654 F.2d 612, 616 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1290 , 71 L.Ed.2d 470 (1982); United States v. Russo, 550 F.Supp. 1315, 1319 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd, 722 F.2d 736 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045 , 104 S.Ct. 716 , 79 L.Ed.2d 179 (1984).

See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 511-13 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. *955 —, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820, 824-26 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1497 , 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983); Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851, 859-61 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d in part and remanded on other grounds, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969).

See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 503-04 (1st Cir.1984) (noting that “[t]he Guidelines, of -course, are not binding,” especially when they appear to conflict with congressional intent), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 815 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); see also Guidelines 16 (indicating that this circuit’s decision in United States v. Harris, 724 F.2d …

Thus free exercise claims have had to yield before state interests in monogamy, see Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 161-67 , 8 Otto 145 , 161-67, 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878), in protecting children’s- health through blood transfusions, see Jehovah’s Witnesses v. King County Hospital Unit No. 1, 390 U.S. 598 , 88 S.Ct. 1260 , 20 L.Ed.2d 158 (1968) (per curiam), aff'g 278 F.Supp. 488 (W.D.Wash.1967), in assuring mandatory and continuous participation in the Social Security sys…

See, e.g., United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 514 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 107-08 (9th Cir.1979).

Rehnquist, Oct. 19,1971, quoted in A. Partridge, supra, at 134; accord United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 503 (1st Cir.1984) (noting congres *1429 sional intent “of avoiding waste of resources on unnecessary severances and separate trials.”), cert. denied, 105 S.Ct. 1355 (1985).

See Donovan v. Red Star Marine Serv., Inc., 739 F.2d 774, 776 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985).