green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson & Johnson v. Aetna Cas.
(2×)
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P. 2d 1038 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 301 (1984); Racer v. Utterman, 629 S.W. 2d 387 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 26 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 42 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brett
(2×)
See People v. Harris, 36 Cal. 3d 36, 63 , 679 P.2d 433, 449 , 201 Cal. Rptr. 782 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 (1984); Provence v. State, 337 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 969 (1977); White v. State, 403 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1229 (1983); Herzog v. State, 439 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 1983); State v. Henderson, 109 N.M. 655, 661 , 789 P.2d 603, 609 (1990); Engberg v. Meyer, 820 P.2d 70, 89 (Wyo. 1991) (Cardine, J., concurring).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
(4×)
See People v. Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36 , 201 Cal.Rptr. 782, 801 , 679 P.2d 433, 452, cert. denied 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2 d 301 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patton v. TIC United Corp.
(2×)
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038 , cert denied 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Curtis
(2×)
See People v. Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36 , 201 Cal.Rptr. 782 , 679 P.2d 433 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); Wilson v. State, 250 Ga. 630 , 300 S.E.2d 640 (1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 199 , 78 L.Ed.2d 174 (1983); State v. Goodman, 298 N.C. 1 , 257 S.E.2d 569 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Menne v. Celotex Corporation
(2×)
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1054 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Menne v. Celotex Corp.
(2×)
See Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1054 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Green
See United States v. Kennedy, 726 F.2d 546, 548 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 (1984). 8 Count 2 of the indictment charged manufacture of the bomb between April 1986 and April 3, 1987.
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Tillman
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See People v. Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36, 57 , 679 P.2d 433, 445 , 201 Cal. Rptr. 782, 794 (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); United States v. Gordon, 493 F.Supp. 814, 820-21 (N.D.N.Y.1980) and authorities cited therein, aff'd, 655 F.2d 478 (2d Cir.1981). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Quigley
(2×)
See also, United States v. Kennedy, 726 F.2d 546, 547-48 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984) (quoting United States v. Glanton, 707 F.2d 1238 (11th Cir.1983) (The traditional test of multiplicity “determines whether each count ‘requires proof of a fact which the other does not.’ ”) The one court which has considered the multiplicity argument in the context of § 844(i) and § 924(c) rejected the defendant’s challenge.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eldon L. Bergeson, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Sheryl L. Bergeson, Deceased v. Edward K. Dilworth and Nathan O. Dilworth
See also Wooderson v. Ortho Phamaceutical Corp., 681 P.2d 1038, 1061 (Kan.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mattingly, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Company
(2×)
See also Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1061 , cert denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984), quoting Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co., 226 Kan. 681 , 602 P.2d 1326, 1331 (1979) (quoting Sanders v. Park Towne, Ltd., 2 Kan.App.2d 313 , 578 P.2d 1131, 1136 (1978)) (Punitive damages "are allowed not because of any special merit in the injured party's case, but are imposed by way of punishing the wrongdoer ... the purpose being to restrain and deter others from the commission of like wrongs.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mattingly, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Co.
(2×)
See also Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1061 , cert denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984), quoting Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co., 226 Kan. 681 , 602 P.2d 1326, 1331 (1979) (quoting Sanders v. Park Towne, Ltd., 2 Kan.App.2d 313, 578 P.2d 1131, 1136 (1978)) (Punitive damages “are allowed not because of any special merit in the injured party’s case, but are imposed by way of punishing the wrongdoer ... the purpose being to restrain and deter others from the commission of like wrongs.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Stephen Lancellotti
See also United States v. Kennedy, 726 F.2d 546, 548 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lopez
See, e.g., People v. Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36 , 201 Cal.Rptr. 782 , 679 P.2d 433 (1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 365 , 85 L.Ed.2d 301 (1985); United States v. Goff, 509 F.2d 825 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857 , 96 S.Ct. 109 , 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975); Stephens v. Cox, 449 F.2d 657 (4th Cir.1971).
Kennedy
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-6.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Brennan, White, Whom.
Published
Lead Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Dissent
Justice White,
with whom Justice Brennan joins,
dissenting.
Because the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case conflicts with the decision of the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in United States v. Canus, 595 F. 2d 73 (1979), I would grant certiorari.