green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.2 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…nder batson, could not have made out a prima facie case of discrimination in juror selection in any event.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
United States v. Bloome
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
he testimony of an accomplice, if believed, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Warner v. State
(2×)
recently completed service on another jury
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sandy Townsley, United States of America v. Ernest (Pat) Gandy, United States of America v. Sorkis Webbe, Jr.
(4×)
nder batson, could not have made out a prima facie case of discrimination in juror selection in any event.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
(2×)
The Jencks Act directs the district court to order the government to produce, upon defense motion, any statement of the witness which relates to the subject matter to which the witness has testified during direct examination. 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (b); see United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 452 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 914 , 108 S.Ct. 262 , 98 L.Ed.2d 220 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
(2×)
The Jencks Act directs the district court to order the government to produce, upon defense motion, any statement of the witness which relates to the subject matter to which the witness has testified during direct examination. 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (b); see United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 452 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 914 , 108 S.Ct. 262 , 98 L.Ed.2d 220 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Matthew Edward Lothian
(2×)
See United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 455 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 914 , 108 S.Ct. 262 , 98 L.Ed.2d 220 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Knox
(2×)
See United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 457 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 914 , 108 S.Ct. 262 , 98 L.Ed.2d 220 ; 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 295 , 98 L.Ed.2d 255 (1987) (state’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude the only two black jurors did not establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination); see also United States v. Sangineto-Miranda, 859 F.2d 1501, 1521 (6th Cir.1988) (fact prosecutor used all its peremptory challenges against blacks, standing alone, does not raise the necessary inference of purposeful discrimination).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hector Jesus Hernandez, Aka: Mauricio Solis, United States of America v. Jorge Walter Cardona
(2×)
See United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 455 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 262 , 98 L.Ed.2d 220 (1987); United States v. Legendre, 657 F.2d 238, 243 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1037 , 102 S.Ct. 580 , 70 L.Ed.2d 483 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reginald Hughes A/K/A Raymond Dashun Calloway
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 457 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 914 , 108 S.Ct. 262 , 98 L.Ed.2d 220 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lawrence Lewis, Jr.
(2×)
See Batson, 106 S.Ct. at 1723 ; see also United States v. Vaccaro, 816 F.2d 443, 457 (9th Cir.) (finding that the systematic exclusion of blacks could not be inferred from the exclusion of the only two black veniremen), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 262 , 98 L.Ed.2d 220 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eugenie J. HUGER
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 87-440.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1987.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Denied.