green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Charles Crain and Tony Watkins
(2×)
See United States v. Duke, 423 F.2d 387 , 391 n. 3 (5th Cir.1970); but cfi United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.) ("if there is a rational basis for attributing interest in the contraband to one party because of relationship with another, a trier of fact can infer sufficient knowledge to support a conviction for possession"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. United States
it is a general rule of statutory construction that where congress has clearly stated its intent in the language of a statute, a court should not inquire further.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Lourdes Topete De Navarro, United States of America v. Rogelio Lopez-Perez
there is a rational basis for attributing interest in the contraband to one party because of relationship with another
discussed
Cited "see"
Salem Minerals Inc. v. United States
See Defendant’s Memorandum, pp. 16-18, citing Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States, 847 F.2d 786, 788-89 (Fed.Cir.) (if terms are plain, the scope of a classification provision is clear), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Drygel, Inc. v. United States
See Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States, 847 F.2d 786, 789 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Motorola, Inc. v. United States
See Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States, 847 F.2d 786, 789 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Warner-Lambert Company v. United States
See Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States, 847 F.2d 786, 789 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Cargill, Inc. v. United States
See Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States, 847 F.2d 786, 789 (Fed.Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sullivan v. United States
Huber Corp. v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 659, 664 (1993) (quoting Madison Galleries Ltd. v. United States, 870 F.2d 627, 629-30 (Fed.Cir.1989) (citing Burlington Northern R.R. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm’n, 481 U.S. 454, 461 , 107 S.Ct. 1855 , 95 L.Ed.2d 404 (1987))); see also Reid v. Dep’t of Commerce, 793 F.2d at 281-82 ; accord Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States, 847 F.2d 786, 788 (Fed.Cir.1988) (“It is a general rule of statutory construction that where Congress has clearly stated its intent in the language of a statute, a court should not inquire further.”), cer t. denied, 488 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patricio Dela Cruz Flores, AKA \Patrick
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988) (relationship between guns and drug transactions warrants reasonable inference that armed possessor of drugs "has something more in mind than mere personal use."). 14 Here, the bullets were plausibly linked with Flores and with his alleged crime of distributing drugs.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Heriberto Farias-Torres, United States of America v. Maria Anita Orozco-Aguilar, United States of America v. Jose Gonzalez-Salas, AKA Jose Orozco
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 838 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988) (large quantity of drugs will support possession conviction). 6 Torres additionally claims that the district court erroneously allowed into evidence statements made by his coconspirators.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Logan Dee Underwood
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988); United States v. Bernal, 719 F.2d 1475, 148 (9th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruben Dario Cadavid, United States of America v. Daniel Mencos, AKA Rodolfo Daniel Santizo Hurtarte, United States of America v. Jose Rachid Abdala
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 838 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Semperit Industrial Products, Inc. v. United States
See id. at_, 976 F.2d at 697 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Oy Wartsila AB
See United States v. Texarkana Trawlers, 846 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988) (wrongful inducement to refinance mortgage notes based on alleged misrepresentations by National Marine Fisheries Service).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hellebrand v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services
See Munn, 970 F.2d at 870 n. 10. 35 "It is a general rule of statutory construction that where Congress has clearly stated its intent in the language of a statute, a court should not inquire further." Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States, 847 F.2d 786, 788 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arias-Villanueva
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837-38 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988); United States v. Smith, 832 F.2d 1167, 1170-72 (9th Cir.1987) (holding that a defendant’s past and subsequent dealings could have supported the jury’s belief that he was involved in an ongoing scheme of which the charged offense was a part).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Arias-Villanueva, United States of America v. Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga, United States of America v. Adolfo Plancarte-Raya
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837-38 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988); United States v. Smith, 832 F.2d 1167, 1170-72 (9th Cir.1987) (holding that a defendant's past and subsequent dealings could have supported the jury's belief that he was involved in an ongoing scheme of which the charged offense was a part).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ositadima Igbo, and Phillip Chukwurah
See id. 30 The Government presented the testimony of Agent Jordan that pagers are commonly used by drug dealers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sylvia Vasquez-Chan, United States of America v. Julia Gaxiola-Castillo
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988); United States v. Rodriguez, 761 F.2d 1339, 1341 (9th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred Moe Hagler, United States of America v. Steven Lamar Green
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837-38 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Douglas Green
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.) (holding that in a cocaine conspiracy, guns seized from defendant's residence were admissible at trial to prove intent to distribute), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988); see also United States v. Butcher, 926 F.2d 811, 816 (9th Cir.) (guns and drugs are "inextricably intertwined"), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2273 (1991). 13 We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting this evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Duane Vaughn
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988); United States v. Crespo de Llano, 838 F.2d 1006, 1018 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Issacs, 708 F.2d 1365, 1371 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 852 (1983); United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fermin Lerma Serrano, United States of America v. Fernando Alfredo Delfierro
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Robert Krikorian
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.) (scales and shotgun), cert. denied 488 U.S. 943 (1988); United States v. Crespo de Llano, 838 F.2d 1006, 1018 (9th Cir.1987) (firearms, mobile phone, pager); United States v. Bernal, 719 F.2d 1475, 1477 (9th Cir.1983) (scales and vials); United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.) (guns), cert. denied 441 U.S. 962 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
See U.S. v. Texarkana Trawlers, 846 F.2d 297, 304 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney K. Lee
See United States v. Chan Yu-Chong, 920 F.2d 594, 597-98 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 [ 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 ] ... (1988) (sentencing scheme that penalizes offense involving large quantity of below-street-quality heroin more harshly than smaller quantity of purer heroin is constitutional); see also United States v. Corley, 909 F.2d 359, 361-62 (9th Cir.1990) (seedling is a plant for guidelines purposes); United States v. Carlisle, 907 F.2d 94, 95 (9th Cir.1990) (cutting is a plant for guideline purposes).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Bressette, AKA Beaux Jangles, United States of America v. Joelene Irene Betonio
See United States v. Gilley, 836 F.2d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir.1988). 27 Evidence of weapons is admissible in a trial for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute because "[i]t may reasonably be inferred that an armed possessor of drugs has something more in mind than mere personal use." United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.) (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Martinez
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988); United States v. Cresta, 825 F.2d 538 , 554 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1042 , 108 S.Ct. 2033 , 100 L.Ed.2d 618 (1988); 1 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vince Lee Motz, United States of America v. Joseph Arlen Langer
See United States v. Chan Yu-Chong, 920 F.2d 594, 597-98 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988)) (sentencing scheme that penalizes offense involving larger quantity of below-street-quality heroin more harshly than smaller quantity of purer heroin is constitutional); see also United States v. Corley, 909 F.2d 359, 361-62 (9th Cir.1990) *1026 (seedling is a plant for guideline purposes); United States v. Carlisle, 907 F.2d 94, 95 (9th Cir.1990) (cutting is a plant for guideline purposes).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Crescenciano M. Pena
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834 , 840 & n. 3 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald E. Peters
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aaron Leon Litteral and Dell Rae Wyatt
See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988). b.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boston Herald, Inc. v. Superior Court Department of the Trial Court
See, e.g., Conway v. United States, 852 F.2d 187, 188 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988); United States v. Hastings, 695 F.2d 1278 (11th Cir.), cert, denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beneficial Consumer Discount Company v. David R. Poltonowicz John Poltonowicz the Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America
See, e.g., United States v. Texarkana Trawlers, 846 F.2d 297, 304 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988); see also McNeily v. United States, 6 F.3d 343, 349 (5th Cir.1993) (referring to § 2680(h) as the “fraud and misrepresentation” exception to the FTCA). 4 Beneficial’s fraud claim alleges that it relied to its detriment on the IRS’s alleged misrepresentation that the IRS was entitled to the information it requested and that the IRS’s certificate relieved Beneficial of any possible liability to the Poltonowiczs in connection with the disclos…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beneficial v. Polonowicz
See, e.g., United States v. Texarkana Trawlers, 846 F.2d 297, 304 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988); see also McNeily v. United States, 6 F.3d 343, 349 (5th Cir. 1993) (referring to § 2680(h) as the "fraud and misrepresentation" exception to the FTCA).4 Beneficial's fraud claim alleges that it relied to its detriment on the IRS's alleged misrepresentation that the IRS was entitled to the information it requested and that the IRS's certificate relieved Beneficial of any possible liability to the Poltonowiczs in connection with the disclosure of the account information.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Ontiveros-Sanchez
United States v. Haro-Portillo, 531 F.2d 962, 963 (9th Cir.1976); see also United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988). 7 Here, the government presented circumstantial evidence from which a reasonable jury could infer that Ontiveros-Sanchez was the driver of the car containing marijuana.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glover Johnson
"In the absence of actual possession, constructive possession may be demonstrated if the defendant has the authority to dispose of the drug, either personally or through an agent, or if he is a participant in a joint venture, thereby sharing dominion and control over the drug with the other participants." United States v. Smith, 962 F.2d 923, 929 (9th Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Restrepo, 930 F.2d 705, 709-710 (9th Cir.1991)); see also United States v. Disla, 805 F.2d 1340, 1350 (9th Cir.1986). 14 Johnson correctly points out that he may not be convicted for mere "association with the p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Barrington A. Hamilton, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 869 F.2d 1118, 1121 (8th Cir.1989) (“[T]he Eighth Circuit is among the many courts that have recognized that juries may infer intent to distribute solely from a defendant’s possession of an unusually large quantity of drugs.”); United States v. Compton, 704 F.2d 739, 742 (5th Cir.1983) (“Intent may be inferred from the quantity.”); see also United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 838 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 , 109 S.Ct. 369 , 102 L.Ed.2d 358 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Manuel Vigoa
See, e.g., United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 837 (9th Cir.) (scales could lead jury to infer intent to distribute, as well as to possess, cocaine, because scales are "one of the tools of the drug trade"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 943 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arko
v.
United States Department of the Air Force
v.
United States Department of the Air Force
No. 88-552.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1988.
488 U.S. 943
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1) · Federal Claims (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.