Reese v. Pennsylvania, 497 U.S. 1003 (1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Reese v. Pennsylvania, 497 U.S. 1003 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“because tremblay claims to have no ownership interest in the specified bank accounts, he lacks standing to challenge the order”
122 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Nicolo (nywd, 2009-02-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Nicolo
W.D.N.Y. · 2009 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because tremblay claims to have no ownership interest in the specified bank accounts, he lacks standing to challenge the order
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) CSX Transportation, Inc. v. United Transportation Union
W.D.N.Y. · 1991 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
c nw -8th cir.
discussed Cited "see" Cornerstone Realty, Inc. v. Dresser Rand Co.
D. Conn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Iron & Steel Institute v. United States E.P.A, 886 F.2d 390, 393 (D.C.Cir.1989) (“While ' invariably described as a ‘cradle-to-grave’ system, [RCRA] in fact reaches ... well beyond the grave.”), cert, denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Walter Wayne Waldron, Jr.
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1576-77 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Dennis Friday
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1581 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990).
cited Cited "see" Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. Sidamon-Eristoff
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Iron and Steel Institute v. U.S. E.P.A., 886 F.2d 390, 403 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); Cooke Sec. 5.03, at 5-53 to 5-54.
cited Cited "see" Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Sidamon-Eristoff
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Iron and Steel Institute v. U.S. E.P.A., 886 F.2d 390, 403 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); Cooke § 5.03[1], at 5-53 to 5-54.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ronald F. Highfill, United States of America v. Sherry Highfill
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1581 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3237 (1990); see also United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 583 (1966). 16 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
cited Cited "see" John D. Jenkins Joanne M. Jenkins Mark Jenkins v. Klamath County
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 6 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed Cited "see" United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Charles L. Smith, Cross-Appellee (2×)
6th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1577 (9th Cir.1989) (“It would make little sense ... to provide for a rebuttable presumption that certain property is subject to forfeiture if facts relative to that property are established by a preponderance of the evidence, then move to a beyond-the-reasonable-doubt standard before the property could be forfeited.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); United States v. Herrero, 893 F.2d 1512, 1541-42 (7th Cir.) (stating approval of Sandini), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 927 , 110 S.Ct. 2623 , 110 L.Ed.2d 644…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Josuf Papraniku, AKA Sofi, United States of America v. Shaban Dobrova
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1573 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3237 (1990). 38 A defendant is entitled to have the court instruct the jury on his theory of defense so long as the theory is supported by law and has some foundation in the record.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harris
D.C. Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hemandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1571 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); United States v. Hall, 843 F.2d 408, 411 (10th Cir.1988); United States v. Fernandez, 822 F.2d 382, 385 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 963 , 108 S.Ct. 450 , 98 L.Ed.2d 391 (1987); United States v. Ricks, 802 F.2d 731, 737 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1009 , 107 S.Ct. 650 , 93 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986); United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214 , 1227 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sandoz
D. Or. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1567-68 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Junior George Brown
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1566 (9th Cir.1989) (continuous nature of crime diminishes significance of twenty-month time lag between acts described in affidavit and issuance of warrant), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3237 (1990).
cited Cited "see" State v. Chicano
Conn. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1582 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, U.S. , 110 S. Ct. 3237 , 111 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Christopher Scott and Johnny Ray Butler
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Canino, 949 F.2d 928, 947-48 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 996 , 112 S.Ct. 1701 , 118 L.Ed.2d 410 (1992), 504 U.S. 910 , 112 S.Ct. 1940 , 118 L.Ed.2d 546 (1992), 504 U.S. 915 , 112 S.Ct. 1954 , 118 L.Ed.2d 558 (1992) (instruction unnecessary), with United States v. Echeverri, 854 F.2d 638, 642-43 (3d Cir.1988) (instruction required), and with United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1572-73 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990) (“better practice” is to give instruction, but harmless error under fa…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kissler
D. Alaska · 1996 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Kow, 58 F.3d at 427-28 (primarily legitimate business) and Center Art Galleries-Hawaii, 875 F.2d at 750-51 (warrant sought to uncover evidence of trafficking in forged Salvador Dali prints, but government knew that less than twenty percent of the business conducted on the premises involved illegal transactions) with United States v. Offices Known as 50 State Distributing Company, 708 F.2d 1371, 1374-75 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) (business permeated with fraud) and United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1568 (9th Cir…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Theodore Edmonds (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Echeverri, 854 F.2d at 643 ; see also, e.g., United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1570 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 747 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Anthony Bruce Cannon
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1566 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990) (where the affidavit tends to establish the existence of a well-entrenched ongoing narcotics operation, “stateness arguments lose much of their force.”); Angulo-Lopez, 791 F.2d at 1399 (“With respect to drug trafficking, probable cause may continue for several weeks, if not months, of the last reported instance of suspect activity.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horsehead Resource Development Co. v. Browner
D.C. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also American Iron & Steel Inst. v. EPA 886 F.2d 390, 393-96 (D.C.Cir.1989) (holding Bevill wastes are not exempt from RCRA corrective action requirements because those requirements apply to hazardous constituents, not merely to hazardous wastes), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990). 3.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc. v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and United States Environmental Protection Agency, Rsr Corporation, International Mill Service, Dow Chemical Company, B.F. Goodrich Company, American Iron and Steel Institute, American Mining Congress, Chemical Waste Management, Inc., Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc., Edison Electric Institute, Solite Corporation, Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Petroleum Institute, Hazardous Waste Treatment Council, Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition, Battery Council International, American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute, Citizens for a Safe Environment, Marine Shale Processors, Inc., Steel Manufacturers Association Specialty Steel Industry of the United States, Tennessee Eastman Company, Cyprus Miami Mining Corporation, International Metals Reclamation Company, Inc., Intervenors. Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Rsr Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Solite Corporation v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and United States Environmental Protection Agency, Akj Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Marine Shale Processors, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Tennessee Eastman Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Citizens for a Safe Environment v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Akj Industries, Inc., Intervenor. Chemical Manufacturers Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, American Iron and Steel Institute v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute, Intervenor. Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc., Edison Electric Institute, Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc., Dow Chemical Company, International Mill Service, Inc., American Mining Congress, American Iron and Steel Institute, Intervenors. Solite Corporation v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and United States Environmental Protection Agency, Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc., Edison Electric Institute, American Mining Congress, Dow Chemical Company, International Mill Service, Inc., Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc., American Iron and Steel Institute, Intervenors. Tennessee Eastman Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc., Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc., Dow Chemical Company, International Mill Service, Inc., American Mining Congress, American Iron and Steel Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Intervenors. Continental Cement Company, Lone Star Industries, Inc., Holnam Inc., Safety-Kleen Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, American Public Power Association, Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, American Mining Congress, Intervenors. Lafarge Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, American Public Power Association, Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, Intervenors. Giant Group, Ltd. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, American Public Power Association, Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, Intervenors
D.C. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also American Iron & Steel Inst. v. EPA, 886 F.2d 390, 393-96 (D.C.Cir.1989) (holding Bevill wastes are not exempt from RCRA corrective action requirements because those requirements apply to hazardous constituents, not merely to hazardous wastes), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990). 30 3.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jerry Wayne Broxson
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
For an affidavit to establish probable cause, "the facts must be sufficient to justify a conclusion that the property which is the object of the search is probably on the premises to be searched at the time the warrant is issued." United States v. Greany, 929 F.2d 523, 525 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1564 (9th Cir.1989) (totality of circumstances set forth in affidavit must demonstrate fair probability that evidence will be found in particular place) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238-39 (1983)), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3237 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Connelly v. State
Md. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hernandez-Es *734 carsega, 886 F.2d 1560 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990) (probable cause not stale where last event occurred almost one year before the warrant issued, but where there was evidence of protracted criminal activity); United States v. Craig, 861 F.2d 818 (5th Cir.1988) (where affidavit described criminal activity of long standing, information need not be regarded as stale even if fairly long periods of time have elapsed between information and the issuance of the warrant).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Feijoo-Tomala
E.D.N.Y · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Ismaili, 828 F.2d 153, 159 (3rd Cir.1987), ce rt. denied 485 U.S. 935 , 108 S.Ct. 1110 , 99 L.Ed.2d 271 (1988) (citing, United States v. Johnson, 752 F.2d 206, 209 (6th Cir.1976); United States v. Bello, 532 F.2d 422, 423 (5th Cir.1976); see also Notes of the Committee on the Judiciary, House Report No. 94-247 A. Moreover, a court does not abuse its discretion where it denies a motion under Rule 15(a) because “the evidence [is] in some respects irrelevant and in others cumulative and possibly inadmissable as hearsay.” See United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Hiland
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1572 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); United States v. Phillips, 869 F.2d 1361, 1866-67 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 2074 , 104 L.Ed.2d 638 (1989); United States v. Murray, 618 F.2d 892, 898 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Larry K. Hiland, United States of America v. Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc., Now Known as Retrac, Inc., United States of America v. Ronald M. Carter, Sr.
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hernandez-Escarsega, 886 F.2d 1560, 1572 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3237 , 111 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); United States v. Phillips, 869 F.2d 1361, 1366-67 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2074 , 104 L.Ed.2d 638 (1989); United States v. Murray, 618 F.2d 892, 898 (2d Cir.1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reese
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 89-1611.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1990.
497 U.S. 1003
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: W.D. New York (2)

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.