green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“By ‘civil action’ we mean what was once called an action at law. There is no right to a jury trial in equity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Runfola & Associates, Inc. v. Spectrum Reporting Ii, Inc.
moreover, we seriously question whether rule 11 sanctions may be imposed where, as here, a magistrate has denied a motion....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.
by 'civil action' we mean what was once called an action at law. there is no right to a jury trial in equity.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. DiMarco
United States v. Patterson, 15 F.3d 169, 171 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Higgins, 967 F.2d 841, 844 (3d Cir. 1992); United States v. Hilton, 946 F.2d 955, 957 (1st Cir. 1991); United States v. Soto, 918 F.2d 882, 883 (10th Cir. 1990); United States v. Adeniyi, 912 F.2d 615, 619 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Pighetti, 898 F.2d 3, 4-5 (1st Cir. 1990); United States v. Morales, 898 F.2d 99, 101-03 (9th Cir. 1990); United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 2 (1990); United States v. Franz, 886 F.2d 973, 976-81 (7th Cir. 1989); United States v. Ev…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See State v. Damon, 214 Conn. 146, 154 , 570 A.2d 700 ([wjhere a constitutional issue turns [on] a factual finding . . . our usual deference ... is qualified by the necessity for a scrupulous examination of the record to ascertain whether such a finding is supported by substantial evidence . . .), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Burroughs
See State v. Damon, 214 Conn. 146, 154 , 570 A.2d 700 (“[w]here a constitutional issue turns [on] a factual finding . . . our usual deference ... is qualified by the necessity for a scrupulous examination of the record to ascertain whether such a finding is supported by substantial evidence” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodroffe v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
See State ex rel Huddleston v. Sawyer, 324 Or 597, 610 , 932 P2d 1145 , cert den, 522 US 994 (1997) (“Laws involving classifications [of persons] created by statute ‘are entitled to no special protection and, in fact, are not even considered to be classes for the purposes of Article I, section 20.’ Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Or 387, 397 , 788 P2d 435 , cert den, 498 US 819 (1990).”).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dupigney
See State v. Damon, 214 Conn. 146, 159 , 570 A.2d 700 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Meehan v. Kansas Department of Revenue
See State v. Downie, 117 N.J. 450, 467-69 , 569 A.2d 242 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990) (prohibiting DUI defendants from challenging the reliability of breathalyzer results based upon testimony regarding scientific problems with partition ratio).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Damon, 214 Conn. 146, 160 , 570 A.2d 700 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Comptroller of the Treasury v. Hickey
See Stevens v. State Tax Assessor, 571 A.2d 1195, 1197 (Me.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 40 (1990); Wheeler v. State, 127 Vt. 361 , 249 A.2d 887, 890 (Vt.), appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 4 , 90 S.Ct. 24 , 24 L.Ed.2d 4 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricky Nelson Stone, United States of America v. Timothy Wayne Dodson
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stone
See United States v. Bayerle , 898 F.2d 28, 30 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Burgos
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 873 , 114 S.Ct. 204 , 126 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); see United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard Gobern
(2×)
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rumney
See Johnpoll v. Thornburgh, 898 F.2d ___ ________ __________ 849, 850-51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990); see ____________ ___ also 28 C.F.R. 542.10-.16, 541.19 (providing ____ administrative remedy for complaints relating to any aspect of imprisonment).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rumney
See Johnpoll v. Thornburgh, 898 F.2d 849, 850-51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990); see also 28 C.F.R. §§ 542.10 -.16, 541.19 (providing administrative remedy for complaints relating to any aspect of imprisonment). 2 To the extent that appellant challenges the fine on the grounds that it violated the applicable sentencing statute by failing to specify a payment date, the argument is without merit.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Ramon Matta-Lopez, AKA Matta-Ballesteros, AKA Juan Ramon, AKA El Negro, AKA Juan Ramon Matta
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 864 (9th Cir.1989), amended on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephan Gary Hill
See United States v. Porter, 909 F.2d 789, 794 (4th Cir.1990) (finding that § 3742 "reflects Congress' measured judgment to allow only limited appellate review of sentences imposed under the guidelines”). 12 . 64 F.3d 147, 150 (4th Cir.1995). 13 . 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.) (recognizing that a defendant may appeal a district court's refusal to depart downward if the sentence was imposed in violation of law because the district court misconstrued its authority to depart), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Greist v. Phillips
(2×)
See Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Or 387 , 788 P2d 435 (held statutory products liability state of repose did not violate the remedy guarantee clause in Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, even though it eliminated the plaintiff’s remedy before the plaintiff suffered an injury), cert den 498 US 819 , 111 S Ct 65 , 112 L Ed 2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwayne Eugene Cook, A/K/A Craig S. Cook
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990). 5 Cook's claims are without merit, and we affirm the sentence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Dorsey
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.) (a refusal to depart is reviewable when it is based on the erroneous conclusion of the district court that it lacked authority to depart), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 66 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Farrell
See State v. Downie, 569 A.2d 242 (N.J. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 63 , 112 L.Ed.2d 38 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. O'Dell Smith
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990). 15 Here, as discussed above, there was no enforceable obligation to move for a downward departure; the Government's refusal was purely discretionary.
discussed
Cited "see"
Daryl A. Schultz, Norita J. Schultz v. David R. Dubois, Personally and as Trustee, Robert E. Grant, Personally and as Judge
See Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583, 589 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990); see also In the Matter of Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, Gekas v. Pipin, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 (1989)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David A. McMasters
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990); United States v. Graham, 946 F.2d 19, 22 (4th Cir.1991). 3 Second, the district court did not clearly err in finding that McMasters obstructed justice by willfully providing materially false information to the probation officer during the presentence investigation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Patricia Helen Bush v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado
See Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583, 586 (5th Cir.) (bankruptcy order authorizing part of bankruptcy estate to be sold is final judgment)(citing cases), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990); see also In re Wade, 991 F.2d 402, 406 (7th Cir.) (bankruptcy orders involving property ownership are final and appealable)(dicta), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 195 (1993). 5 We address appellant's claim that she was entitled to in forma pauperis status to appeal the bankruptcy court's order to sell a residence located in Lakewood, Colorado, in which she held an interest.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William E. Coleman
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Baxter v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.
See Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Or. 387, 392 , 788 P.2d 435 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan E. Platt
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 860 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990). 6 In his opening statement, the prosecutor informed the jury that Platt had sent the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") a check for $9,800 in 1985 but had failed to pay the IRS any money since that time.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990). “[[Investigators’ reports ‘clearly fall within the language of the Jencks Act.’” United States v. Hudson, 813 F.Supp. 1482, 1490 (D.Kan.1993) (quoting United States v. Allen, 798 F.2d 985, 997 (7th Cir.1986)); see United States v. Smith, 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (“Interview notes could be ‘statements’ under the Act if they are substantially verbatim.” (citations omitted)), cert, denied, — …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Sheng
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836 , 854 n. 10 (9th Cir.1989), amended, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990) 3 Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), disclosed no other issues
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
United States v. Smith 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 204 , 126 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); see United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gookins
See State v. Downie, 117 N.J. 450 , 569 A.2d 242 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 63 , 112 L.Ed.2d 38 (1990); Romano v. Kimmelman, 96 N.J. 66 , 474 A.2d 1 (1984); State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146 , 199 A.2d 809 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ariel Escobedo, A/K/A Ariel Joquin, A/K/A Ignacio Hernandez
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 868 (9th Cir.1989) (failure of district court to examine documents in camera and subsequent remand to determine whether FBI report fell within scope of Jencks Act), amended on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Ag West Supply v. Hall
See Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Or 387, 397 , 788 P2d 435 , cert den 498 US 819 (1990); Hale v. Port of Portland, supra, 308 Or at 525 .
cited
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,739 William L. Baxter, Ppa Andrew T. Baxter, Third-Party-Defendant v. Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc., Third-Party-Plaintiff
See Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Ore. 387, 392 , 788 P.2d 435, 437 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 [ 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 ] (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Theodore Fonville
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christian Liviu Bota
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Even if Respondent succeeds on appeal, an award of back pay would redress any injury to Mr. DiGirlamo: “Irreparable injury is one that cannot be addressed through a monetary award. [Thus,] where money damages are adequate compensation [injunctive relief] should not issue.” JSG Trading Corp. v. Tray-Wrap, Inc., 917 F.2d 75, 79 (2d Cir.1990); see Johnpoll v. Thornburgh, 898 F.2d 849, 851 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 63 , 112 L.Ed.2d 38 (1990); Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. Schlesinger, 888 F.2d 969, 974-75 (2d Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Willis Ray Cash
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Oquendo
See State v. Damon, 214 Conn. 146, 153 , 570 A.2d 700 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Thomas
See, e.g., U.S. v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (rejecting due process challenge to sentencing scheme based upon aggregate weight of Dilaudid); Van Ens v. Florida, 48 So.3d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review denied, 59 So.3d 110 (Fla.2011) (sentencing scheme based upon aggregate weight of the narcotic pill Lorcet did not violate either equal protection or due process); North Carolina v. Jones, 85 N.C.App. 56 , 354 S.E.2d 251 (1987), review denied, 320 N.C. 173 , 358 S.E.2d 61 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 969 , 108 S.Ct. 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Melody L.
(2×)
We have applied this heightened level of review of the factual record in cases involving: a criminal defendant's right to due process; see, e.g., State v. Lawrence, 282 Conn. 141, 154 , 920 A.2d 236 (2007) (scrupulous examination of record to determine whether defendant's confession was voluntary); State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 335 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (scrupulous examination of record in reviewing finding of aggravating factor); equal protection; see, e.g., State v. Ellis, 232 Conn. 691, 700-701 , 657 A.2d 1099 (1995) (scrupulous examination of record in reviewing trial court's finding that…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Geiger v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
The IFRP has been held to have been “properly enacted in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act.” James v. Quinlan, 866 F.2d 627, 631 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 870 , 110 S.Ct. 197 , 107 L.Ed.2d 151 (1989), and “has been upheld generally, and against constitutional due process challenges.” Montano-Figueroa, 162 F.3d at 549 (citations omitted); Weinberger v. United States, 268 F.3d 346, 360 (6th Cir.2001), cert. dismissed, 535 U.S. 967 , 122 S.Ct. 1433 , 152 L.Ed.2d 377 (2002); see also Johnpoll v. Thornburgh, 898 F.2d 849, 851 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (BOP “has not ex…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Voth v. State
See Huddleston, 324 Or at 610 (discussing Measure 11 and that criminal defendants are not a true class); see also Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Or 387, 397-98 , 788 P2d 435 , cert den, 498 US 819 (1990) (reviewing product liability claims); Hale, 308 Or at 524-26 (addressing tort damages).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.
See also Sealey v. Hicks, 95 Or App 182, 186 , 768 P2d 468 (1989) (holding that ORS 30.905 applied to the plaintiffs negligence claim for the failure to warn of a defective product “whether the cause of action is characterized as strict liability or negligence”), aff'd on other grounds 309 Or 387 , cert den 498 US 819 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Story
On the ultimate question of whether a seizure occurred, however, we conduct a scrupulous, independent review of the record to ensure that the trial court’s determination was supported by substantial evidence.” State v. James, 237 Conn. 390, 405-406 , 678 A.2d 1338 (1996); see also State v. Damon, 214 Conn. 146, 154 , 570 A.2d 700 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Paul Georges
Id.; see also United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 865 (9th Cir.1989) (failure to instruct the jury at the time of the testimony was not an abuse of discretion as the final instructions were appropriate), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990).
Johnpoll
v.
Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States
v.
Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States
No. 89-1913.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · Oregon Supreme Court (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.