green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Runfola & Associates, Inc. v. Spectrum Reporting Ii, Inc.
moreover, we seriously question whether rule 11 sanctions may be imposed where, as here, a magistrate has denied a motion....
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 873 , 114 S.Ct. 204 , 126 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); see United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daryl A. Schultz, Norita J. Schultz v. David R. Dubois, Personally and as Trustee, Robert E. Grant, Personally and as Judge
See Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583, 589 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990); see also In the Matter of Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, Gekas v. Pipin, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 (1989)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990). “[[Investigators’ reports ‘clearly fall within the language of the Jencks Act.’” United States v. Hudson, 813 F.Supp. 1482, 1490 (D.Kan.1993) (quoting United States v. Allen, 798 F.2d 985, 997 (7th Cir.1986)); see United States v. Smith, 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (“Interview notes could be ‘statements’ under the Act if they are substantially verbatim.” (citations omitted)), cert, denied, — …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
United States v. Smith 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 204 , 126 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); see United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeff William Darden
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 860 (prosecutor's prior affiliation with the Central Intelligence Agency in a prosecution in which the defendant claimed that the CIA instructed him to spend investors' funds was not grounds for disqualification where the only evidence of a conflict of interest was based upon "unfounded gossip and speculation" fueled in part by the defendant), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990); see also United States v. Heldt, 668 F.2d 1238, 1275 (D.C.Cir.1981) (explaining that the "victim" of an illegal entry of a United States Attorney's office was the United States…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Bobbitt, United States of America v. Michael Bobbitt
See United States v. Kessi, 868 F.2d 1097, 1102 (9th Cir.1989) (citing Fed.R.Crim.P. 30). 10 In United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 865 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990), this court found failure to give a contemporaneous instruction was harmless in a case where the evidence was far more prejudicial than in the present case, and by applying a less strict standard of review than is required in the present case.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio Rafael Gonzalez
(2×)
This latter approach is supported by the same rationale we apply to cases making a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: "We prefer appellants to raise such claims in a habeas proceeding because it permits the district judge first to decide whether the claim has merit, and second, if it does, to develop a record as to what counsel did, why it was done, and what, if any, prejudice resulted." United States v. Molina, 934 F.2d 1440, 1446 (9th Cir.1991); accord United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 859 (9th Cir.1989), amended, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 6…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Earl Watson
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 859 (9th Cir.1989), amended, 902 F.2d 18 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayne Stanley Page v. United States
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 862 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990) (prosecution's description of defendant as a "lizard" and a "Hydra, a nine-headed serpent" did not violate due process); United States v. Birges, 723 F.2d 666, 672 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 943 (1984) ("It is neither unusual nor improper for a prosecutor to voice doubt about the veracity of a defendant who has taken the stand.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shafii A. Shaibu, AKA Donald Theodore Casper AKA Kenneth C. Sun AKA Raymond Mueller Howell, United States of America v. Shafii A. Shaibu and Edward Omiunu
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 859 (9th Cir.), as amended 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sure-Snap Corp. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.
See Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (following bankruptcy court’s order confirming sale of an asset, trustee’s suit against purchaser alleging fraud held barred).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sure-Snap Corporation v. State Street Bank And Trust Company
See Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (following bankruptcy court's order confirming sale of an asset, trustee's suit against purchaser alleging fraud held barred). 36 On the final issue of factual similarity, appellants also are not persuasive.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maurice Isabel, United States of America v. Ronald Descoteaux, A/K/A Piece of Cake, A/K/A Wacky Ron
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836 , 861 n. 24 (9th Cir.1989) (declining to consider merits of allegations of perjured testimony made without benefit of citation to record) (collecting cases), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tommy Hart v. Allan A. Stagner
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 864 (9th Cir.1989), amended on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (although crime occurred in isolated state of Hawaii, no prejudice because not a small or rural community).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerald L. Minsky
See, e.g., United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867-69 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990) (remand for further findings required in view of absence of in camera review).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nos. 90-2039, 90-2040
In its recent decision in In re Howe (Howe v. Vaughan ), 913 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir.1990), the court stated, "[t]he D-1 Enterprises court merely decided that when a claim cannot be litigated effectively, it is not precluded." Howe, 913 F.2d at 1146 ; see also, Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (distinguishing D-1 Enterprises from Southmark Properties v. Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.1984) on the basis of the limited nature of the proceeding in D-1 Enterprises ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.
In its recent decision in In re Howe (Howe v. Vaughan), 913 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir.1990), the court stated, “[t]he D-l Enterprises court merely decided that when a claim cannot be litigated effectively, it is not precluded.” Howe, 913 F.2d at 1146 ; see also, Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (distinguishing D-1 Enterprises from Southmark Properties v. Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.1984) on the basis of the limited nature of the proceeding in D-l Enterprises).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joan Anna Yuk Lin Van Schoiack Frederick Neal Stribling Cecil Cleve Van Schoiack Larry Cecil Van Schoiack Allene Van Schoiack Appellants-Appellants
See, e.g., United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 865 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New Castle County v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
See also Starns v. Avent, 96 B.R. 620, 630 (M.D.La.1989) (citing other cases holding that a court’s formal order, not its oral expressions, controls), aff’d, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990). .The court’s order, dated November 2, 1987, provides: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion entered in this case on this date, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodney D. HENDRICK
v.
H.E. AVENT
v.
H.E. AVENT
No. 89-1923.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
Denied.