green
Positive treatment
11.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Conner
But cf. United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1512 (11th Cir.1991) (en banc) (when an agent knocked on defendant’s door for several minutes as he shouted in English and in Spanish, “I’m a police officer, I would like to talk to you, I need for you to come here,” the court concluded that the agent’s words were “in the form of a request,” and thus the defendant’s decision to open the door was voluntary), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rosemond
See United States v. Tobin[, 923 F.2d 1506, 1509 (11th Cir.1991), certiorari denied 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991), citing United States v. Young, 909 F.2d 442, 446 (11th Cir.1990).] The test for whether exigent circumstances exist is an objective one.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cole v. Chevron USA, Inc.
(2×)
See Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.1991)(cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Martin, Unpublished Decision (12-3-2004)
See United States v. Tobin (C.A.11, 1991), 923 F.2d 1506 , 1509 , certiorari denied (1991), 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , citing United States v. Young (C.A.11, 1990), 909 F.2d 442 , 446 . {¶ 24} The test for whether exigent circumstances exist is an objective one.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Martin, Unpublished Decision (12-3-2004)
See United States v. Tobin (C.A.11, 1991), 923 F.2d 1506 , 1509 , certiorari denied (1991), 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , citing United States v. Young (C.A.11, 1990), 909 F.2d 442 , 446 . {¶ 24} The test for whether exigent circumstances exist is an objective one.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ponce Munoz
See United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1511 (11th Cir.) (“Reasonable suspicion cannot justify the warrantless search of a house, but it can justify the agents’ approaching the house to question the occupants.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991); United States v. Hardeman, 36 F.Supp.2d 770, 777 (E.D.Mich.1999) (discussing the “knock and talk” procedure to obtain a suspect’s consent to search).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1511 (11th Cir.) (“Reasonable suspicion cannot justify the warrantless search of a house, but it can justify the agents’ approaching the house to question the occupants.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991); United States v. Hardeman, 36 F.Supp.2d 770, 777 (E.D.Mich.1999) (discussing the “knock and talk” procedure to obtain a suspects consent to search).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Howard Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); and Doe v. Hillsboro Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirksey v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida
(2×)
See Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991).
examined
Cited "see"
Legend Airlines, Inc. v. City of Fort Worth
(4×)
See Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020, 1023 (5 th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); see also Kansas v. United States, 16 F.3d 436, 438 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 945 , 115 S.Ct. 354 , 130 L.Ed.2d 309 (1994). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC v. Doris
(2×)
See Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kinnison v. Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Parks
(2×)
See Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 , 60 U.S.L.W. 3057 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olbres
The Third Circuit ___ viewed the Commission's policy statement on "vocational skills" as being based on an underlying "principle . . . that a sentencing judge may grant a departure based on a defendant's ability to make a work-related contribution to society only in extraordinary circumstances." Id. at 785 ; ___ see also United States v. Reilly, 33 F.3d 1396, 1424 (3d Cir. ___ ____ _____________ ______ 1994); United States v. Mogel, 956 F.2d 1555, 1564 (11th ______________ _____ Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 857 (1992); accord United _____ ______ ______ ______ States v. Rutana, 932 F.2d 1155 (…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olbres
The Third Circuit viewed the Commission’s policy statement on “vocational skills” as being based on an underlying “principle ... that a sentencing judge may grant a departure based on a defendant’s ability to make a work-related contribution to society only in extraordinary circumstances.” Id. at 785; see also United States v. Reilly, 33 F.3d 1396, 1424 (3d Cir.1994); United States v. Mogel, 956 F.2d 1555, 1564 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 857 , 113 S.Ct. 167 , 121 L.Ed.2d 115 (1992); accord United States v. Rutana, 932 F.2d 1155 (6th Cir.) (“[E]ven assuming that [defendan…
discussed
Cited "see"
Busse Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Coalition for the Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. FCC, 931 F.2d 73 , 79-80 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991). 25 Aside from the difficulty of reconciling these two lines of cases, the parties have also not extensively briefed the zone of interests issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Busse Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Coalition for the Presenation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. FCC, 931 F.2d 73 , 79-80 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Janus Petroleum Co., Inc. v. United States
See Brookhurst, Inc. v. United States, 931 F.2d 554 , 556-57 (9th Cir.), cert. denied., 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); Tucker v. United States, No. 87 Civ. 3349, 1989 WL 58012 , at *3-4 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. German Villabona-Garnica, Jorge Enrique Munoz
See United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1510 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (warrantless search requires probable cause and exigent circumstances), cer t. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991).
examined
Cited "see"
Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Nynex Corporation, Intervenors
(4×)
See Coalition for the Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. FCC, 931 F.2d 78 , 76-77 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); Alianza Federal, 539 F.2d at 739 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Edward Hromada
See United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1513 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991) (a reasonable belief that someone else could be inside the house permits a protective sweep).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond E. And Dorothy J. O'Bryant v. United States
See Brookhurst, Inc. v. United States, 931 F.2d 554 , 556-57 (9th Cir.) (government may use methods other than specific erroneous refund suit provision (§ 7405) to recover erroneous refunds), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hopkins v. State
See United States v. Tobin, 890 F.2d 319, 327 (11th Cir.1989), vacated, 902 F.2d 821 (11th Cir.), on rehearing, 923 F.2d 1506, 1511 (11th Cir.1990) (en banc) ("[r]easonable suspicion cannot justify the warrantless search of a house"), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991); State v. Davis, 295 Or. 227 , 666 P.2d 802, 812 (1983); State v. Beavers, 859 P.2d 9, 17 (Utah App.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oliver Schools, Inc. v. Foley
See Kelly Rare, Ltd. v. O’Rourke, 930 F.2d 170 , 175 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 300 , 116 L.Ed.2d 244 (1991); Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc. v. Perales, 878 F.2d 577, 581-82 (2d Cir.1989); see also Continental Training Services, Inc. v. Cavazos, 893 F.2d 877 (7th Cir.1990) (property interest exists in eligibility to participate in student loan program).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Kansas v. United States of America
See Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020, 1023 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1993
See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 2136 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) In dismissing ARINC's and Omninet's challenges, we have relied in part on our decision in Coalition for the Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. FCC, 931 F.2d 73 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991) ("CPHB "), a case that denies the challenges of two petitioners for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Phillips
(2×)
Id., ¶ 18; see also United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1511 (11th Cir. 1991) (en banc), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 (1991) (holding the agents could reasonably conclude from the defendants' hurried actions and furtive looks that the defendants were either aware or afraid that someone was watching them such that the destruction or removal of some portion of the narcotics was therefore a possibility that justified the warrantless entry into the home based on exigent circumstances). ¶ 15.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knutson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
See, e.g., Littlefield v. U.S., 927 F.2d 1099, 1104 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991) (implying that a distinction might be present where the employer was in a better position than the contractor to anticipate dangers and implement precautions, or where there was a question as to the competency or solvency of the independent contractor); Karadanis v. Newcomb, 698 P.2d 872, 874 , 101 Nev. 196, 199 (1985) (holding that a landowner may be liable for injuries to an independent contractor’s employee if the hazard *995 ous condition was not “open…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Moore
Compare Axselle, 604 F.2d at 1338 (citing Bonanno and . addressing knowledge) with United States v. Antoon, 933 F.2d 200, 203-04 (3rd Cir.) (applying Kelly and focusing on issue of coercion), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 300 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991). 6 While consent in some cases may be shown solely with evidence that the party knows a call is to be recorded, in other cases the circumstances surrounding the call may give rise to the issue of whether the consent was voluntary, and evidence of coercion may negate the consent implied by the party knowingly agreeing to the recording.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sunkett
See, e.g., U.S. v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1513 (11th Cir.1991) (fact that three vehicles were parked in front of house and that defendant had lied about codefendant being in house gave rise to reasonable belief that additional people could be hiding in house), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hardeman
See id.; see also United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1509 (11th Cir.1991), reh’g denied, 935 F.2d 1297 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miller
Id. at 543 ; see also United States v. Tobin, 923 F.2d 1506, 1509 (11th Cir.1991), reh’g denied, 935 F.2d 1297 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 243 (1991) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. United States
See, e.g., Brookhurst, Inc. v. United States, 931 F.2d 554 , 555-57 (9th Cir.1991) (government entitled to collect erroneous refund by supplemental assessment under section 6204(a)), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); Estate of Wilbanks v. Commissioner, 61 T.C.M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Isabel YANEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
Id. ; see also Littlefield v. United States, 927 F.2d 1099, 1103 (9th Cir.) (duty under section 413 is limited to requiring a contractor to take appropriate safety measures in its contract), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); Nelson v. United States, 639 F.2d 469, 477 (9th Cir.1980) ("The essence of the duty ... imposed by Section 413 [is] to provide contractually for the contractor's observance of detailed and specific safety precautions.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. United States
No. 960, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 42 (1928); see also Brookhurst, Inc. v. United States, 931 *87 F.2d 554, 557 (9th Cir.) (IRS not limited to § 7405 because imperfect assessment may be reassessed within three years from date tax return was filed), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 907 , 112 S.Ct. 299 , 116 L,Ed.2d 242 (1991). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. USA, IRS
No. 960, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 42 (1928); see also Brookhurst, Inc. v. ___ ____ _________________ United States, 931 F.2d 554 , 557 (9th Cir.) (IRS not limited _____________ to 7405 because imperfect assessment may be reassessed within three years from date tax return was filed), cert. _____ denied, 502 U.S. 907 (1991). ______ -8- 8 administrative collection procedures to recover non-rebate refunds.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John James v. United States
Peculiar risk liability is vicarious when injury is caused "by the failure of the contractor to exercise reasonable care to take [special] precautions, even though the employer has provided for such precautions in the contract or otherwise." Restat.2d Torts, Sec. 416. 31 ............................................................ 32 .................... 33 * * * 34 It is plain from the discussion in Privette that the Supreme Court intended its holding to apply only in those situations where third-party liability is vicarious rather than direct. 35 29 Cal.Rptr.2d at 14 (brackets in original) (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pedro Jolio Prandy-Binett
(2×)
See, e.g., Coalition for the Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. FCC, 893 F.2d 1349, 1368 (D.C.Cir.1990), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 931 F.2d 73 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); Athens Community Hosp., Inc. v. Schweiker, 743 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1984); In re Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Kansas v. United States
See, e.g., Cramer v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 1020, 1031 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 298 , 116 L.Ed.2d 242 (1991); City of Houston v. Federal Aviation Administration, 679 F.2d 1184, 1193 (5th Cir.1982); Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Port Authority, 658 F.Supp. 952, 958-959 (S.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd, 817 F.2d 222 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1006 , 108 S.Ct. 1467 , 99 L.Ed.2d 697 (1988). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amos A. Hopkins v. Donnie R. Sparks, as the District Manager, Canon City District Office, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Canon City, Colorado
See Kale, 489 F.2d at 454 ; see also Coalition for Preservation of Hispanic Broadcasting v. FCC, 931 F.2d 73 , 77 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 298 (1991). 5 Because plaintiff's complaint was filed before the BLM's decision on the amended application, the complaint did not contest any of the reasons given by the BLM for its denial of plaintiff's application.
Cramer
v.
Skinner, Secretary of Transportation
v.
Skinner, Secretary of Transportation
No. 91-112.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1991.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.