green
Positive treatment
10.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joe Murphy, Yoram Ben-Amram, and Galatex Development, Llc v. the City of Galveston, Texas
See City of El Paso v. Madero Dev., 803 S.W.2d 396, 401 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1991, writ denied), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 (1992) (reversing trial court’s judgment and dismissing based on lack of ripeness despite two city alderman stating “words to the effect that they wished to impede the development of the property by zoning the property” for more restrictive use (citing Mayhew)). 12 code and reapply.” However, after the application was denied, Ben-Amram did not resubmit a SUP application that would have reflected completion of the repairs and/or an engineer’s letter certifying t…
discussed
Cited "see"
the City of Galveston, Texas v. Joe Murphy, Yoram Ben-Amram and Galtex Development, LLC
See City of El Paso v. Madero Dev., 803 S.W.2d 396, 401 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1991, writ denied), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992) (reversing trial court’s judgment and dismissing based on lack of ripeness despite two city alderman stating "words to' the effect that they wished to impede the development of the propérty by zoning the property” for more restrictive use (citing Mayhew )). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Little Elm Plaza, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Legacy Bank of Texas AND the State of Texas
We explained that such an inverse condemnation claim would not be ripe because “no regulatory taking occurs until the governmental entity charged with implementing the regulation reaches a final decision regarding application of the regulation to the property.” Id.; see City of El Paso v. Madero Dev., 803 S.W.2d 396, 400 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1991, writ denied), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Little Elm Plaza, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Legacy Bank of Texas AND the State of Texas
We explained that such an inverse condemnation claim would not be ripe because “no regulatory taking occurs until the governmental entity charged with implementing the regulation reaches a final decision regarding application of the regulation to the property.” Id. ; see City of El Paso v. Madero Dev. , 803 S.W.2d 396, 400 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1991, writ denied), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 1073 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kalda v. Sioux Valley Physician Partners, Inc.
(2×)
Martin v. Feilen, 965 F.2d 660, 666 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1054 , 113 S.Ct. 979 , 122 L.Ed.2d 133 (1993); see Pegram, 530 U.S. at 225-26 , 120 S.Ct. 2143 . 17 We held in Hickman that the defendant-administrators' refusal to allow the plaintiffs to remain on the payroll to become eligible for retirement benefits did not implicate ERISA's fiduciary duties because that decision was a "day-to-day corporate business transaction." 840 F.2d at 566 (quotations and citations omitted); accord Adams v. LTV Steel Mining Co., 936 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kalda v. Sioux Valley Physician Partners, Inc.
(2×)
We held in Hickman that the defendant-administrators’ refusal to allow the plaintiffs to remain on the payroll to become eligible for retirement benefits did not implicate ERISA’s fiduciary duties because that decision was a “day-to-day corporate business transaction.” 840 F.2d at 566 (quotations and citations omitted); accord Adams v. LTV Steel Mining Co., 936 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 968 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cowan v. Treetop Enterprises, Inc.
See Waffle House, 1983 WL 2108 , Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992), Meyer v. Worsley Companies, 881 F.Supp. 1014, 1020 (E.D.N.C.1994). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Blessing v. Deere & Co.
(2×)
Dyce v. Salaried Employees’ Pension Plan of Allied Corp., 15 F.3d 163, 165 (11th Cir.1994); Williams v. Cordis Corp., 30 F.3d 1429, 1431 (11th Cir.1994) (per curiam); see Adams v. LTV Steel Mining Co., 936 F.2d 368, 371 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 968 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); 29 U.S.C. § 1054 (g)(1).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fredette v. BVP Management Associates
(2×)
See Peigh *1510 tal v. Metropolitan Dade County, 940 F.2d 1394 (11th Cir.1991) (considering the Title VII claims of a white male plaintiff regarding an affirmative-action plan adopted to promote women and racial minorities at a time when 75% of the firefighters in the department were white and 99% were male), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Indiana Gas Co., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co.
(2×)
Co. (1st Cir.1995) 43 F.3d 749, 754 , discussing Great Lakes Container v. National Union Fire Ins. (1st Cir.1984) 727 F.2d 30, 33 ; accord, Lumbermens Mut. v. Belleville Industries (1st Cir.1991) 938 F.2d 1423, 1428-1430 [where manufacturer engaged in intentional, continuous pattern of pollution as part of business operation, occasional accident resulting in pollution did not confer coverage under liability policy], cert. den. 502 U.S. 1073 [ 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992) ].) IMCERA at 54-55 (footnotes omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taxman v. Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway
(2×)
Johnson, 480 U.S. at 638 , 107 S.Ct. at 1455 ; see Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, 940 F.2d 1394, 1408 (11th Cir.1991) (affirmative action plan valid under Title VII where it never requires hiring unqualified person over qualified person), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); cf. United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149, 177-78 , 107 S.Ct. 1053, 1070 , 94 L.Ed.2d 203 (1987) (same under equal protection).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1996
(2×)
Johnson, 480 U.S. at 638 , 107 S.Ct. at 1455 ; see Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, 940 F.2d 1394, 1408 (11th Cir.1991) (affirmative action plan valid under Title VII where it never requires hiring unqualified person over qualified person), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); cf. United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149, 177-78 , 107 S.Ct. 1053, 1070 , 94 L.Ed.2d 203 (1987) (same under equal protection).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1996
(2×)
See Hewitt v. Joyner, 940 F.2d 1561, 1566-67 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); Okrand v. City of Los Angeles, 207 Cal.App.3d 566 , 254 Cal.Rptr. 913, 916 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpenter v. City & County of San Francisco
(2×)
See Hewitt v. Joyner, 940 F.2d 1561, 1566-67 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); Okrand v. City of Los Angeles, 207 Cal.App.3d 566 , 254 Cal.Rptr. 913, 916 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bd Ed Piscataway
See Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, 940 F.2d 1394, 1408 (11th Cir. 1991) (affirmative action plan valid under Title VII where it never requires hiring unqualified person over qualified person), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 (1992); cf. United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149, 177-78 (same under equal protection).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kim v. FRANK MOHN A/S
However, the rule specifically provides that the time period “does not apply to service in a foreign country pursuant to subdivision (f) [govern *480 ing service on a defendant in a foreign country].” Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); see Lucas v. Natoli, 936 F.2d 432, 433 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 971 , 117 L.Ed.2d 136 (1991) (120 day time limit for service does not apply to service in foreign countries); accord Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tracy J. Jones v. George R. Tiller, M.D., P.A. And George R. Tiller, Individually
See Murray v. Stuckey's, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 , 618 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 (1992); 29 C.F.R. 541.103. 17 Jones does not dispute Tiller's testimony that her responsibility was to ensure that all of the business operations of the clinic were accomplished, either by delegating the task or by doing it herself.
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Sunnyvale v. Mayhew
See City of El Paso v. Madero Dev., 803 S.W.2d 396, 400 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991, writ denied), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Hey
See Committee on Legal Ethics v. Farber, 185 W.Va. 522 , 408 S.E.2d 274 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Branch v. Seibels
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 497 U.S. 547, 596 , 110 S.Ct. 2997, 3025-26 , 111 L.Ed.2d 445 (1990) (quoting Wygant, 476 U.S. at 281 , 106 S.Ct. at 1850 (opinion of Powell, J.)); accord Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, 940 F.2d 1394, 1410 (11th Cir.1991) (opinion of Brown, J.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca11 1994
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm'n, 497 U.S. 547, 596 , 110 S.Ct. 2997, 3025-26 , 111 L.Ed.2d 445 (1990) (quoting Wygant, 476 U.S. at 281 , 106 S.Ct. at 1850 (opinion of Powell, J.)); accord Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, 940 F.2d 1394, 1410 (11th Cir.1991) (opinion of Brown, J.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Seibels
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 497 U.S. 547, 596 , 110 S.Ct. 2997, 3025-26 , 111 L.Ed.2d 445 (1990) (quoting Wygant, 476 U.S. at 281 , 106 S.Ct. at 1850 (opinion of Powell, J.)); accord Peightal v. Metropolitan Dade County, 940 F.2d 1394, 1410 (11th Cir.1991) (opinion of Brown, J.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard T. Kreisner v. City of San Diego
(2×)
See Hewitt v. Joyner, 940 F.2d 1561, 1564 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); ACLU v. City of St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard T. Kreisner v. City of San Diego
(2×)
See Hewitt v. Joyner, 940 F.2d 1561, 1564 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); ACLU v. City of St.
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. AB
See, Adams v. LTV Steel Mining Co., 936 F.2d 368, 371 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 968 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patricia D. Rush v. McDonald Corporation, Sharon Funston, and William R. Rose
See Adams v. LTV Steel Mining Co., 936 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir.1991) (no § 510 violation by allowing salaried employees to retire early pursuant to benefit plan, but denying same right to hourly employees), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 968 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992). 62 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Ellerbe Becket Construction Services, Inc.
See Spinden, 94 F.3d at 427 ; see also Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 , 618 (8th Cir.1991) (holding that fact that employee spent 65 to 90 percent of time on nonexempt tasks was not controlling factor under the regulations), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992). “[A]n employee’s primary duty is that which is of principle importance to the employer rather than collateral tasks which may take up more than 50% of his or her time.” Id.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Jones Restaurants, Inc.
The Burger King court’s reasoning is equally applicable here: “The exercise of discretion ... even where circumscribed by prior instruction, is as critical to [the company’s] success as adherence to ‘the book.’ Burger King, of course, seeks to limit likely mistakes in judgment by issuing detailed guidelines, but judgments must still be made.” Id. at 521-22 ; see also Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 , 619 (8th Cir.1991) (“[W]e do not believe that the local store manager’s job is any less managerial for FLSA purposes simply because he or she has an active regional manag…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fain v. State
(2×)
Of Commerce, 649 S.W.2d 769, 771-72 (Tex.App. San Antonio 1983, no writ); see also City of El Paso v. Madero Development, 803 S.W.2d 396, 399 (Tex.App.El Paso 1991, writ denied), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992) (there are three jurisdictional elements: jurisdiction over subject matter; jurisdiction over person or res; and power to render judgment or relief under the circumstances).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayer v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF CHASE COUNTY
See Spinden v. GS Roofing Products Co., Inc., 94 F.3d 421 (8th Cir.1996) cert, denied„ — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1254 , 137 L.Ed.2d 334 (1997) (plant controller in charge of “essentially a one-man department” was an exempt administrative employee even though he spent most of his time doing bookkeeping functions); Reich v. Avoca Motel Corp., 82 F.3d 238 (8th Cir. 1996) (administrative exemption covers motel managers who spent a significant amount of time on-call and doing non-exempt work); Strieker v. Eastern Off Road Equipment, Inc., 935 F.Supp. 650 (D.Md.1996) (administrative exemption appl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grimes v. Kinney Shoe Corp.
See, e.g., Murray v. Stuckley’s Inc., 939 F.2d 614 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992); O’Dell v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., 856 F.2d 1452, 1453-54 (9th Cir.1988); Donovan v. Burger King Corp., 675 F.2d 516, 518, 521 (2nd Cir.1982) (Donovan II); Donovan v. Burger King Corp., 672 F.2d 221 (1st Cir.1982) (Donovan I); Russell v. Mini-Mart, Inc., 711 F.Supp. 556 (D.Mont.1988); Stein v. J.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Motorists Insurance v. ARTRA Group, Inc.
(2×)
See also Lumbermens Mut. v. Belleville Industries, 938 F.2d 1423, 1428 (1st Cir. 1991) (rejecting the use of microanalysis to determine whether specific events occurring during the ordinary course of business operations were “sudden and accidental” and noting the “infeasibility of attempting to assess discrete ‘fringe’ events, in the case of a company with a history of contributing over a lengthy period to a gradual accumulation of pollutants”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 969 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Feilen
See also Adams v. LTV Steel Mining Co., 936 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 968 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co., 911 F.2d 911 , 918— 19 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1310 , 113 L.Ed.2d 244 (1991); Amato v. Western Union Int'l, Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 , 1416-17 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dism’d, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986); United Paperworkers Int'l Union v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp., 771 F.Supp. 992, 999 (E.D.Mo.1991), aff’d, 961 F.2d 1384 (8th Cir.1992); Moehle v. N.L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Kulzer Roofing, Inc.
See also Adams v. LTV Steel Mining Co., 936 F.2d 368 , 370 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 968 , 117 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992); Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc., 908 F.2d 1155, 1158 (3d Cir. 1990); and Kreml v. Diamond Shamrock Corp., 701 F.Supp. 1400 , 1405 n. 2 (N.D.Ill.1988).
Adams
v.
LTV Steel Mining Co.
v.
LTV Steel Mining Co.
No. 91-866.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1992.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.