Duffy v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 113 S. Ct. 1044 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Duffy v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 113 S. Ct. 1044 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “A new contention is not ... necessarily a new issue.”
78 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Haskell v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. (In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.) (deb, 2005-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Haskell v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. (In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.)
Bankr. D. Del. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
a new contention is not ... necessarily a new issue.
discussed Cited "see" Kaler v. Kana (In re Kana)
Bankr. D.N.D. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yamaha Corp. of Am. v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 , reh’g denied, 507 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 1436 , 122 L.Ed.2d 802 (1993) (opining that the fact that evidence could have been presented on an issue in a prior suit, but was not, does not avoid the application of collateral estoppel); Akron Presform Mold Co. v. McNeil Corp., 496 F.2d 230, 235 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 310 , 42 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (indicating that additional factual allegations not made in a prior suit did not permi…
discussed Cited "see" Reynaga v. Sun Studs, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yamaha Corp. of America v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) (“[0]nce an issue is raised and determined, it is the entire issue that is precluded, not just the particular arguments raised in support of it in the first case” (emphasis in original)).
cited Cited "see" Sierra Club v. Babbitt
E.D. Cal. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yamaha Corp. of America v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254 (D.C.Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Deitz v. Palaigos
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Yamaha Corp. of Am. v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 256 , (D.C.Cir.1992) (holding that issue preclusion extends to a matter that the court “must necessarily, albeit implicitly,” have decided), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Ramallo v. Reno
D.D.C. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yamaha Corp. of America v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254 (D.C.Cir.1992) (issue must be “actually and necessarily determined” to create collateral estoppel bar in subsequent litigation), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" In Re DEF Investments, Inc.
Bankr. D. Minn. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yamaha Corp. of Am. v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254 (D.C.Cir. 1992), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1044, 122 L.Ed.2d 353 , reh’g denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1436 , 122 L.Ed.2d 802 (1993) (opining that the fact that evidence could have been presented on an issue in a prior suit, but was not, does not avoid the application of collateral estoppel); Akron Presform Mold Co. v. McNeil Corp., 496 F.2d 230, 235 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 310 , 42 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (indicating that additional factual allegations not made in a prior suit did not permit their reli…
discussed Cited "see" Hayes v. City of Seattle (2×)
Wash. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish Cy., 119 Wn.2d 91, 97 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1044 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" Fulani v. Bentsen (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yamaha Corp. of America v. United States, 745 F.Supp. 734, 737-38 (D.D.C.1990), aff'd, 961 F.2d 245 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied,— U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications Corporation
D.C. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yamaha Corp. v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 253-54 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Phillip Lucas . v. State of Tennessee Michael E. Collins v. State of Tennessee
Tenn. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Downs v. United States, 382 F.Supp. 713, 750 (M.D.Tenn.1974) (in a Federal Tort Claims Act case it was unnecessary to decide whether government agents were immune, because the government would not be immune even if they were), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.2d 990 (6th Cir.1975); see also Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish Cy., 119 Wash.2d 91, 108 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992), cert. denied, ____ U.S. _____, 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992). -22- The Restatement (Second) of Torts recognizes this notion: With respect to some government functions, the threat of individual liability would have a deva…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lucas v. State
Tenn. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Downs v. United States, 382 F.Supp. 713, 750 (M.D.Tenn.1974) (in a Federal Tort Claims Act case it was unnecessary to decide whether government agents were immune, because the government would not be immune even if they were), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.2d 990 (6th Cir.1975); see also Lutheran Day Care v. Snokomish Cy., 119 Wash.2d 91, 108 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992), cer. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Fag Bearings Corporation
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Yamaha Corp. of Am. v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254 (D.C.Cir.1992) (“[0]nce an issue is raised and determined, it' is the entire issue that is precluded, not just the particular arguments raised in support of it in the first case.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993); Sec.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Nagalingam, No. 97-6433, 1998 WL 739822 , at *3 (6th Cir.1998); see also United States v. Sissler, No. 91-2113, 1992 WL 126974, at *6-7 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dockets Nos. 98-7269, 98-7270
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Moore, et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 132.02(2)(d), at 132-26 (3d ed.1998); see, e.g., Yamaha Corp. v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254-55, 257 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993)
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hickerson v. City of New York
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Moore, et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 132.02(2)(d), at 132-26 (3d ed.1998); see, e.g., Yamaha Corp. v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 254-55, 257 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1078 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mission Springs Inc. v. City of Spokane
Wash. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County, 119 Wash.2d 91, 107 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992) (policy rationale for quasijudicial immunity), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mission Springs, Inc. v. City of Spokane
Wash. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County, 119 Wn.2d 91, 107 , 829 P.2d 746 (1992) (policy rationale for quasi-judicial immunity), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S. Ct. 1044 , 122 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." John J. Kinney, Jr. v. District of Columbia
D.C. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Yamaha Corp. of America v. United States, 961 F.2d 245, 253-54 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1044 , 122 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peter DUFFY and New England Insurance Company
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, etc.
No. 92-707.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1993.
113 S. Ct. 1044
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: D. Delaware (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Denied.