green
Positive treatment
12.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
CROWLEY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Accord State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1 , 109–10 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. P.M. (16-06-0776, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
"A defendant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one." Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 619 (1953); accord, State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 169-70 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 (1993). [State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 537 (2007) (second and third alterations in original) (quoting State v. R.B., 183 N.J. 308, 333-34 (2005)).] For that reason, "legal errors, which creep into the trial but do not prejudice the rights of the accused or make the proceedings unfair, may [not] be invoked to upset an otherwise valid conviction . . . ." State v. Orecchio, 16 N.J. 125, 129 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SHANNON FIELD (13-04-0205, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
See State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 72 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S. Ct. 1306 , 122 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fausto Camacho (072525)
Rather, the prejudicial effect of the failure to give a requested instruction on the presumption of innocence must be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances — including all the instructions to the jury, the arguments of counsel, whether the weight of the evidence was overwhelming, and other relevant factors — to determine whether the defendant received a constitutionally fair trial. [Ibid.; see State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 145 , 586 A.2d 85 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993).] The Court ultimately reversed the judgment and remande…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Heisler
See State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 130 , 586 A.2d 85 (1991) (expert testimony barred), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993); State v. LaBrutto, 114 N.J. 187, 204-06 , 553 A.2d 335 (1989) (expert testimony permitted); State v. Toro, 229 N.J.Super. 215, 222-24 , 551 A.2d 170 (App.Div.1988) (expert testimony permitted), certif. denied, 118 N.J. 216 , 570 A.2d 973 (1989), overruled on other grounds, State v. Velez, 119 N.J. 185, 187 , 574 A.2d 445 (1990) .
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Wakefield
(4×)
"A defendant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one." Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 619 , 73 S.Ct. 481 , 97 L.Ed. 593 (1953); accord, State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 169-70 , 586 A. 2d 85 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1993). [ State v. R.B., 183 N.J. 308, 333-34 , 873 A. 2d 511 (2005).] That principle applies equally in death penalty cases.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. R.B.
“A defendant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one.” Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 619 , 73 S.Ct. 481 , 97 L.Ed. 593 (1953); accord, State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 169-70 , 586 A.2d 85 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. RB
"A defendant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one." Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 619 , 73 S.Ct. 481 , 97 L.Ed. 593 (1953); accord, State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 169-70 , 586 A. 2d 85 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Giles v. State
See, Stevens v. Zant , 968 F.2d 1076 , 1081 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 695 (1993) (In a challenge to the imposition of a death sentence, the prejudice part of the Strickland test focuses on whether the sentencer would have still imposed the death penalty after balancing the aggravating and mitigating circumstances.)" (Supplement record, p. 108-10.) Carroll stated that funds for experts were available to him even if not approved by the circuit court and that it was a strategic decision not to present evidence of Giles's drug use given the fact t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Marshall v. Hendricks
(2×)
See 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marshall
(2×)
See State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1 , 586 A. 2d 85 (1991) (Marshall I) , cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 134 , 586 A. 2d 85 (1991), cert. denied, Marshall v. New Jersey, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1993); State v. Toro, 229 N.J.Super. 215, 223 , 551 A. 2d 170 (App. Div.1988), certif. denied, 118 N.J. 216 , 570 A. 2d 973 (1989); State v. Utsch, 184 N.J.Super. 575, 580 , 446 A. 2d 1236 (App. Div.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boyd v. State
See State v. Tarver, 629 So.2d at 21. `In a challenge to the imposition of a death sentence, the prejudice prong of the Strickland inquiry focuses on whether "the sentencer ... would have concluded that the balance of aggravating and mitigating circumstances did not warrant death."` Stevens v. Zant, 968 F.2d 1076, 1081 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 695 (1993), quoted in Daniels, 650 So.2d at 568 ." Bui v. State, 717 So.2d 6, 22 (Ala.Cr.App. 1997).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Feaster
(4×)
See State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 76 , 586 A.2d 85 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harris
(2×)
See State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 73-78 , 586 A. 2d 85 (1991) ( Marshall I ), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harvey
(2×)
See State v. Marshall, 130 N.J. 109, 211-12 , 613 A. 2d 1059 (1992) ( Marshall II ) (discussing statistical sampling and noting that statisticians would expect the actual results to differ from the sample by standard deviations), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1993); Harvey I, supra, 121 N.J. at 427 , 581 A. 2d 483 (recognizing that a confidence interval provides information on the accuracy of an expert's opinion).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Chew
(2×)
See State v. Marshall, 130 N.J. 109, 175-76 , 613 A. 2d 1059 (1992) ( Marshall II ), cert denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1993) (discussing cases of murders for pecuniary gain, including insurance proceeds).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marshall
(2×)
See State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1 , 586 A. 2d 85 (1991) ( Marshall I ), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest Joe Maddox
See United States v. Sitton, 968 F.2d 947, 960 (9th Cir.1992) (ineffective assistance of counsel claims generally should be raised by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 (1993). 7 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
Grund v. State
See Heck v. State, 552 N.E.2d 446 (Ind.1990), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1308 , 122 L.Ed.2d 696 (1993) (although hearsay, evidence of a prior assault on the victim can be admissible in a murder case to prove motive or identity).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Webb
See State v. Marshall, 130 N.J. 109, 151-59 , 613 A.2d 1059 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S. Ct. 1306 , 122 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sarno
See United States v. Sitton, 968 F.2d 947, 958-59 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 695 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1995
See United States v. Sitton, 968 F.2d 947, 958-59 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 695 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wolfe
See, e.g., State v. Marshall, 123 N.J. 1, 130 , 586 A.2d 85 (1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993) (finding no error in precluding a defense witness not on the witness list from testifying mid-trial because the prosecutor would not have had time to locate a rebuttal witness).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Greenleaf
Evid. 702 and our prior cases, did not allow the experts to testify, concluding that the jurors did not need expert testimony to understand either defense and therefore such testimony would not assist the jury “to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Id.; see also State v. Provost, 490 N.W.2d 93, 103 (Minn.1992) (stating that “expert opinion testimony regarding the general effects * * * of intoxication is ordinarily inadmissible because most jurors have some experience with these conditions”) cert, denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993); Sta…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roseli BANUELOS-RODRIGUEZ, AKA: Rogelio Banuelos-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
A, p.s. 3; see also United States v. Sitton, 968 F.2d 947, 962 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1306 , 122 L.Ed.2d 695 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nuerge v. State
See Fleener v. State, 648 N.E.2d 652, 656 (Ind.Ct.App.1995) (holding that a child molestation victim’s mother’s testimony that her daughter’s revelations of abuse precipitated her divorce from the defendant did not constitute hearsay, but rather, was offered to explain to the jury why her marriage to the defendant had ended), summarily affirmed in part, trans. granted in part on other grounds, 656 N.E.2d 1140 ; see also Heck v. State, 552 N.E.2d 446, 451 (Ind.1990), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 1308 , 122 L.Ed.2d 696 (1993) (holding that a police officer’s testimony about in…
Provost
v.
Minnesota
v.
Minnesota
No. 92-6831.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1993.
507 U.S. 929
Published
Sup. Ct. Minn. Cer-tiorari denied.