green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michal Jankowski, United States of America v. Sylwia Jankowski
See United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1287-88 (8th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1345 , 122 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993); accord United States v. Mitchell, 725 F.2d 832, 833-35 (2d Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michal Jankowski
See United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1287-88 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 (1993); accord United States v. Mitchell, 725 F.2d 832, 833-35 (2d Cir. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis L. Barrett v. United States
See United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1285 (8th Cir.1992) (where another person robbed bank using firearm, and defendant provided transportation and means of concealment and knew other person planned to use gun in committing robbery, robber’s gun became defendant’s in eyes of law), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1345 , 122 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis L. Barrett v. United States
See United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1285 (8th Cir. 1992) (where another person robbed bank using firearm, and defendant provided transportation and means of concealment and knew other person planned to use gun in committing robbery, robber’s gun became defendant’s in eyes of law), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip Henry Stands, Also Known as Phillip Henry Atkinson, Also Known as Phillip Henry Creek, United States of America v. Waylon Eric Duran, United States of America v. Miguel J. Duran
See United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1285 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1345 , 122 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip Henry Stands
See United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1285 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1345 , 122 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Owen Hinton, Jr.
See Cooley v. Carmike Cinemas, Inc., 25 F.3d 1325, 1330 (6th Cir.1994) (citing United States v. Markarian, 967 F.2d 1098, 1103 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1344 (1993)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ivan Colvin (93-5253) Laurence Davis (93-5254)
See United States v. Markarian, 967 F.2d 1098, 1104 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1344 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilford H. Niece
See United States v. Markarian, 967 F.2d 1098, 1103 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1344 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANNY RAY WHITE
See United States v. Martinez, 975 F.2d 159, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. B.H.
See, e.g., United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1287-88 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943, 113 S.Ct. 1345, 122 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993); United States v. Marenghi, 893 F.Supp. 85, 92-96 (D.Me.1995), aff'd, 109 F,3d 28 (1st Cir.1997); United States v. Brown, 891 F.Supp. 1501, 1508 (D.Kan.1995); Romero, supra, 13 Cal.Rptr.2d at 338-39, rev’d on other grounds, 8 Cal.4th 728 , 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 270 , 883 P.2d 388 (1994); State v. Williams, 132 Wash.2d 248, 937 P.2d 1052, 1058 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. BH
See, e.g., United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1287-88 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1345 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 727 (1993); United States v. Marenghi, 893 F.Supp. 85, 92-96 (D.Me.1995), aff'd, 109 F. 3d 28 (1st Cir.1997); United States v. Brown, 891 F.Supp. 1501, 1508 (D.Kan.1995); Romero, supra , 13 Cal.Rptr. 2d at 338-39, rev'd on other grounds, 8 Cal. 4th 728 , 35 Cal.Rptr. 2d 270 , 883 P. 2d 388 (1994); State v. Williams, 132 Wash. 2d 248 , 937 P. 2d 1052, 1058 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santiago-Becerrill v. United States
See also United States v. Simpson, 979 F.2d 1282, 1288 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1345 , 122 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993) (setting forth generic formula for aiding and abetting liability).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Engdahl
A statement by the prosecution “is impermissible vouching only if the jury could reasonably believe that the prosecutor is indicating a personal belief in the witness’ credibility, either through explicit personal assurances of the witness’ veracity or by implicitly indicating that information not presented to the jury supports the witness’ testimony.” Bowie, 892 F.2d at 1498 ; see also United States v. Hartsfield, 976 F.2d 1349, 1354 (10th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rowe
The balancing test protects ... the government in criminal cases.... ” Id.; see also United States v. Figueroa, 976 F.2d 1446 , 1456 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1346 , 122 L.Ed.2d 728 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 419, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6003, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9807 United States of America v. Jerome Fitzgerald Rowe, Aka: Jerome Rowe
The balancing test protects ... the government in criminal cases...." Id.; see also United States v. Figueroa, 976 F.2d 1446 , 1456 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 943 , 113 S.Ct. 1346 , 122 L.Ed.2d 728 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mitchell Locklear, United States of America v. Lee Allen Lowry
We have little trouble concluding that, even assuming collection of drug monies does not constitute part of drug “distribution”, it does constitute part of a conspiracy to distribute drugs, see United States v. Woods, 995 F.2d 713, 718 (7th Cir.1993) (“Carrying a gun to protect drugs or money constitutes ‘use’ under § 924(c)(1).”); see also United States v. Markarian, 967 F.2d 1098, 1104 (6th Cir.1992) (“It is clear that under general drug conspiracy law the two trips to collect drug money were acts in furtherance of the conspiracy.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1344 , …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCrary El
v.
Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
v.
Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
No. 92-7141.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1993.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.