discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marvin Herron, Also Known as Spook, United States of America v. Robert L. McKinney Also Known as Dusharme Taylor, Also Known as Clifton Paige, United States of America v. Charles Bell Estell, Also Known as China, United States of America v. Danny K. Jarrett, Also Known as Dough-Boy, United States of America v. Rosalind D. Glover, United States of America v. Gene A. Nelson, Also Known as Geno See e.g., United States v. Peery, 977 F.2d 1230, 1234 (8th Cir.1992) (money sent via three separate wire transfers), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 946 , 113 S.Ct. 1354 , 122 L.Ed.2d 734 (1993); United States v. Posters 'N' Things, Ltd., 969 F.2d 652, 661 (8th Cir.1992) (commingling of proceeds from drug paraphernalia sales with legitimate business receipts), aff'd 511 U.S. 513 , 114 S.Ct. 1747 , 128 L.Ed.2d 539 (1994); United States v. Long, 977 F.2d 1264, 1270 (8th Cir.1992) ("transactions permitted ... drug dealers to make drug money appear to be money earned through work in a legitimate job") 4 Be…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marvin Herron See e.g., United States v. Peery, 977 F.2d 1230, 1234 (8th Cir.1992) (money sent via three separate wire transfers), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 946 , 113 S.Ct. 1354 , 122 L.Ed.2d 734 (1993); United States v. Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd., 969 F.2d 652, 661 (8th Cir.1992) (commingling of proceeds from drug paraphernalia sales with legitimate business receipts), aff'd 511 U.S. 513 , 114 S.Ct. 1747 , 128 L.Ed.2d 539 (1994); United States v. Long, 977 F.2d 1264, 1270 (8th Cir.1992) (“transactions permitted ... drug dealers to make drug money appear to he money earned through work in a legitimate job"…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Larry Dwight Jaynes and April Marie Jaynes See, e.g., United States v. Powell, 982 F.2d 1422, 1431 (10th Cir.1992) (a variance between the *1506 allegations of conspiracy in the indictment and the evidence presented at trial does not require reversal unless the defendant's substantial rights are affected, and a defendant's substantial rights are not prejudiced “merely because the 'defendant is convicted upon evidence which tends to show a narrower scheme than that contained in the indictment, provided that the narrower scheme is fully included within the indictment' ”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 946 , 1041, 507 U.S…